Several people posted to say that they do not see a need for 'SUK' because they already don't refer to knives as 'tactical.' You are missing the point. It is not about people like you. It's about the many who do use the term, especially people in the knife industry.
For those who say it's caving in to political correctness, it is exactly the opposite. It is a tactical move in the war against political correctness.
And finally for those who say it's just too late for a rebranding, you are really the ones who are caving. Writer/radio host/gun-rights advocate Tom Gresham talks about how he has adopted a 'no shrug' policy for 2008. So often we see rights being trampled, idiocy running amok, etc., and we just shrug our shoulders and say "that's just the way it is." Tom G. says we need to stop that.
Elkins45 has come up with an excellent suggestion with his 'sport utility knife' catchphrase. It's already familiar. (and BTW those who point out that enviros have tried to attack SUV''s--that true, but they have had little to no success). It's pretty descriptive, since so-called tactical knives are often used outdoors, and they have general utility. And finally, there is the abbreviation of SUK, which is kind of funny. I don't see the media launching a campaign to ban the SUK, just on the grounds that too many people would be laughing at them.
You can call a knife any name you want, but I'll bet a surprisingly high percentage of people interested in knives are not politically active and until more of "us" get active in politics we will still be headed down the road talready aken by countries like England. A group of doctors over there want to get rid of pointy kitchen knives.