I do not buy TK any more. After a while it is like reading the same articles over and over, only with different knives substituted. There simple cannot be
that many knives evaluated that are the be-all and end-all, as every knife reviewed by TK seems to be.
Their editorial slant is against bigger and thicker knives, that is until a big thick knive is reviewed, then it too becomes the be-all and end-all, for that month only. This always seems to be accompanied by an ad for that particular big, thick knife located within a page or two of the article. And no issue is complete without denigrating anyone who uses larger, thicker knives as an "armchair warrior" or "living room commando" or some similar sneer.
And really, how many pictures of an author in a crouching, menacing, face-on pose holding the knife-of-the-month in one hand and the other arm and fist across his chest do we need to see? In one issue there were two of these in one article by a frequent author. Made me laugh out loud. And no, it wasn't Jerry VanCook. At least when he strikes a pose it looks like he knows what he is doing.
The deciding factor of whether a magazine is too expensive or not is whether you choose to buy it. If you choose buy it then you do not find it to be too expensive. I have decided that TK is too expensive for me personally, for what I recieve in content.
Blade Magazine is not too expensive for me. Knives Magazine is usually too expensive, but if I flip through it and see a few things I am interested in I may buy it occasionally.