- Joined
- May 26, 1999
- Messages
- 1,964
I also applaud the great posts in this thread, especially Old Knife Guy's.
You should certainly run away or hand over your money, if it's possible and there's a chance it will prevent your getting killed. Plus, a little forethought will allow you to avoid going to places where such a thing might happen.
Yes, carrying a small knife in your pocket doesn't turn you into a ninja. But if you're in a genuine life-threatening situation, why wouldn't you try to use your knife to save yourself?
Golok said
Knives are tools. Their main funtion is to improve the quality of life; not to take it. Yet, you have to admit that statements like the above are totally wrong. A blade 4 inches or under can be an extrodinarily dangerous weapon, even in the hands of someone who has no "training" whatsoever.
Jim March's bear analogy is very insightful and it reminded me of the "Bear Fight" article in the December 2000 Knives Illustrated. Want proof that a 4 inch folding blade can do substantially more than "nothing" to improve the situation of the victim? I can't think of a better example.
The article talks about a 69 year old hunter who killed a 750 pound Alaskan Brown Bear with just a Buck 110. It didn't mention if the guy was an expert at bear fighting, but I assume he had no edged weapon training and was just running on instinct.
You should certainly run away or hand over your money, if it's possible and there's a chance it will prevent your getting killed. Plus, a little forethought will allow you to avoid going to places where such a thing might happen.
Yes, carrying a small knife in your pocket doesn't turn you into a ninja. But if you're in a genuine life-threatening situation, why wouldn't you try to use your knife to save yourself?
Golok said
A less than 4 inch blade (unless it is in the hands of an expert) will do nothing to improve the situation for the potential victim.
Knives are tools. Their main funtion is to improve the quality of life; not to take it. Yet, you have to admit that statements like the above are totally wrong. A blade 4 inches or under can be an extrodinarily dangerous weapon, even in the hands of someone who has no "training" whatsoever.
Jim March's bear analogy is very insightful and it reminded me of the "Bear Fight" article in the December 2000 Knives Illustrated. Want proof that a 4 inch folding blade can do substantially more than "nothing" to improve the situation of the victim? I can't think of a better example.
