- Joined
- Jan 27, 2019
- Messages
- 654
I was surprised today when I switched out my Sandvik Opinel No.6 for a new SAK ALOX Victorinox Electrician because it would fit better (thinner) in my pocket sheath.
The blade on my SAK Electrician is 2.5mm thick (more stout than the 91mm plastic handled SAKs) and the Opinel is only 1.4mm thick.
The opinel is OEM lightly convexed and stropped by me and the SAK is fresh out of the box (and less sharp and also had 2 sections with a noticable wire-edge). The Opinel's around 30° total and the 93mm victorinoxes are 40°.
I thought it would be worse, but I hoped it would still be decent enough for my daily apple cutting at work.
THE SAK WAS A BETTER APPLE SLICER.





It's both a much thicker bladestock and the SAK also has a thicker edge and a lower angle bevel...
So WTF!?
It's drag. The SAK while SLICING an apple, is somewhat chopping / batoning in the sense that it's splitting the firm fruit as its slicing around the longitudinal cuts through the apple.
The opinel (which has a very similar blade height of 14-15mm) has significantly more drag and resistance because there's more surface area in contact.
Now I REALLY appreciate Jerry Fisk's geometry considerations and the mighty swedge...
I'd be interested in competing the 93mm SAK against a swedged Opinel No.6. It might break even!?
Also, the distal taper along the length of the SAK is completely on one side of the knife. This is so that another small tool can snuggle up beside it.
This makes it even more of a wedge... Both top to bottom and front to back!

Even when you think you're slicing, you're actually chopping!?!?




The blade on my SAK Electrician is 2.5mm thick (more stout than the 91mm plastic handled SAKs) and the Opinel is only 1.4mm thick.
The opinel is OEM lightly convexed and stropped by me and the SAK is fresh out of the box (and less sharp and also had 2 sections with a noticable wire-edge). The Opinel's around 30° total and the 93mm victorinoxes are 40°.
I thought it would be worse, but I hoped it would still be decent enough for my daily apple cutting at work.
THE SAK WAS A BETTER APPLE SLICER.





It's both a much thicker bladestock and the SAK also has a thicker edge and a lower angle bevel...
So WTF!?
It's drag. The SAK while SLICING an apple, is somewhat chopping / batoning in the sense that it's splitting the firm fruit as its slicing around the longitudinal cuts through the apple.
The opinel (which has a very similar blade height of 14-15mm) has significantly more drag and resistance because there's more surface area in contact.
Now I REALLY appreciate Jerry Fisk's geometry considerations and the mighty swedge...
I'd be interested in competing the 93mm SAK against a swedged Opinel No.6. It might break even!?
Also, the distal taper along the length of the SAK is completely on one side of the knife. This is so that another small tool can snuggle up beside it.
This makes it even more of a wedge... Both top to bottom and front to back!


Even when you think you're slicing, you're actually chopping!?!?




