- Joined
- Mar 27, 2011
- Messages
- 269
I've just done some research as Ankerson has has suggested. Yes I found some pics (just like the broken Golok above). You've got to realise people that forums such as these tend to draw together bad instances in unrealistic ways. Take for example the golok picture. That was taken probably some two years ago now. And yet I'm sure it gets posted every time someone tries to explain their position on Bark River. There's a picture of a CS Recon Scout broken in near identical fashion (snow and all) that gets recycled too and that was taken in 2005 IIRC. That too gets used to justify CS's apparently dodgy quality issues.
What I did see however were pictures of blade damage either as a result of poor technique (ie hammering directly through bone) or blade grinding, meaning it was ground too thin for the purposes to which it was used. Mike has recently changed practices with his grinding to accommodate the need for thicker edges as people wanted a more robust grind.
Bark River makes some 20-30K knives, by hand, every year. And yet people jump on threads such as these and post their handful of experiences as proof of poor quality or poor workmanship. As others have said before me, if you find a knife maker that has never had an issue with customer satisfaction please PM. I'll sell all my spydercos, barkies and cold steels and jump on that bandwagon (or at least for sufficient time before the inevitable happens).
I have had failures from various brands and personally I couldn't be bothered to take pictures to post let alone pursuing warranties in some cases. I am happy to hear that he has made changes to his design and possibly tightened up his quality control. Every good report I hear pushes me a little closer to forgiving the man himself.