- Joined
- May 9, 2007
- Messages
- 226
Well if you want to look at only martial type cutting tests then I would also bet a Stanley utility knife does pretty darn good too.
The Delica has a nice sharp edge but I will never understand why they had to make the grind so short on it. If I am cutting string, or opening mail or whatever it doesn't matter.
However, slicing a tomato, cutting a rubber hose (like a radiator hose or a 1/2" thick braided rubber air hose) the Delica cuts worse than the Tenacious.
I am not at all kicking on martial arts but I don't do it and I don't carry or buy my knives for it. So for what I do, the Tenacious outcuts the D4. However, after I spend $45 to have my ZDP-189 D4 reground by Tom Krein it will do what I want it to do......be a knife and not a screwdriver.![]()
Well, I am sure you will enjoy the Krein regrind. Congratulations--in ZDP-189, that should be an interesting piece.
As for the utilitiy knife versus the Delica in a martial context--actually the utility knife does very poorly compared to the D4. The Delica cuts meat very well--whether in a martial context, or a "let's eat a bit of this Porterhouse" context. The D4 is a tough little knife, and can stand a lot of abuse. I still like the D3 better though (I like the splinter picker tip). I do prefer the ergonomics of the Military, or some of my various other Spydercos or Emersons, to the D4. Between the D4 and the Tenacious, though, I prefer the D4--based on ergonomics, "the feel of quality," and the actual performance of the Delica in a variety of contexts.