Very true. It also might be difficult to decide on a blade size (unless Darrel could allow choice of the 3-, 4-, or 5.5-inch versions as one of the options for each person to choose from). I love big knives and don't have any blade length restrictions where I live, so a 4" or 5.5" Madd Maxx or AXD would be great for me; the version with 3" blade would be too small for my liking. But I know for a lot of people personal preference and/or legal restrictions might make the 4 and especially 5.5 versions a deal-breaker. By contrast, the 3.5" blade length of the HTM Gunhammer and Lightfoot/Lambert models seems to be a sweet spot for a lot of people.I think the AXD and the Maxx might be a little out of people's price ranges though.
I'm starting to think, though, that the Lambert would be the perfect choice for a group buy. Aside from the price and blade length being a good fit for most people, if we got a CF/LSCF inlay instead of the frag pattern on the handle, it'd really allow us to use the special order to replace something that a lot of us aren't huge fans of (the frag pattern) with something we'd like a lot more. (Obviously, we'd also customize the blade steel and other stuff as well.)
Keep in mind that we're not necessarily limited to one knife per year, except by "real life" things like our budgets and the wrath of significant others. If we can get 25+ commitments for a given configuration, Darrel will make it.
Having said that, it's been a ton of work managing this process, so if we're going to do it again -- let alone more than once per year -- I'd definitely want to streamline the process and fix some of the things that didn't work as well this time around. This would include, most importantly, a hard deadline for commitments/deposits/finalization of the order, and a quicker turnaround on polls and other configuration decisions.