The Auction Site, anybody notice that...............

Ballenxj said:
I'll take one of each? ;) :D
-Bruce
Click to expand...

Bruce, The $50 mint 2OT is a little Australian jokes Larry and I have going.
Larry’s 2OT is priceless and I would have to pay Larry for a look at his 2OT.
The Last D’holders would also sell for close to $1000 I would think… Ken
 
I think it's time to repatriate those 2OT Old Timers to their motherland. Before something bad happens to them down there, like being eaten by sharks or lost in a coal mine. ;)
 
Indeed. I worry that there's not enough gravity down there to keep them secured to terra firma. While up here in the more natural topside of Earth, as we age, gravity tends to increase. Beam 'em up!
 
koldgold said:
Bruce, The $50 mint 2OT is a little Australian jokes Larry and I have going.
Larry’s 2OT is priceless and I would have to pay Larry for a look at his 2OT.
The Last D’holders would also sell for close to $1000 I would think… Ken
Click to expand...
Thanks Ken. I knew that, but was having a bit of fun on my own. Hence the winky emoticon after the post. :D
However, if you guys ever change your minds about that................. ;)
-Bruce
 
just saw this one on the auction site.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=260987504658&ssPageName=ADME:X:RTQ:US:1123
looked at the description and then at the photo of the knife. noticed the difference in the serial number. wrote and asked the seller about it his response was:
"Thank you for your interest and inquiry.
You are correct about the apparent discrepancy. However, as we explain in our description, the knife in the picture is not the actual knife at auction. It is a display knife that we have used for picture purposes only. The reason we use the shot with the serial number is to show that each knife is serially numbered and where that number is.
The actual sale knife, in this case #N 29069, is wrapped in its original factory wrapping. The knife had been unwrapped only once, in 1981, when the serial number was recorded.
We hope this has been helpful.
Thanks again, and good luck and good bidding!"
now is it just me or does anyone else like to see the actual knife they are bidding on?
 
I too would prefer to see the actual product before I bid, however his story about the knife being in it's original wrapper since 1981 is possible. Also he has 100% on his feedback.
I might have gone for it depending on how I felt at the moment. ;)
-Bruce
 
"Patina has built up over the years so it will need to be cleaned. We can shine it if you want. Please let us know."

I would be pretty leery based on this comment. I'll bet the brass bolsters look like crap. There shoould be no patina on a stainless blade.
 
delmas2nd said:
this one ended the other day and in looking at the knife it does not look like it was manufactured by Schrade. am i correct in this thinking or did they make the knife in question. the pins look all wrong as does the handle.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dl...sspagename=STRK:MEWAX:IT&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc
Click to expand...
I've never seen or heard of an LB95 before? Did they actually make one? I don't know. The "PROV. USA" on the tang leads me to believe that if nothing else, it was built for Schrade by somebody else?
-Bruce
 
Colonial had a set of knives called the Ranger series. LB95, LB125 on so on. So either the knife was made by Colonial or someone for them....I don't think it was a Schrade made knife.

Russell
 
Rusty1 said:
Colonial had a set of knives called the Ranger series. LB95, LB125 on so on. So either the knife was made by Colonial or someone for them....I don't think it was a Schrade made knife.

Russell
Click to expand...

^ This ^ It is a Colonial.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top