I was thumbing through my collection the other day and there are some nice knives there a few barkies falkniven etc. but the tools that get the most use seem to be the fiskars hatchet the moras and the saks. all 3 can be had for under 50.00...Now granted if I had to knowingly go out into the world with just one tool that might change my perspective, I've moved through alot of combos that I've talked about here but it always seems come camping time those are the mvp's So for $150 I could have 3 sets of identical tools that will (if cared for properly) last me the rest of my days and probably be there for my son as well. This doesn't mean that I don't enjoy my nice knives, and that I can't appreciate the workmanship of a Brkt blade, or a GB hatchetr (items like those are about as close to xcaliber as I'll get) but as an Amature hobby woodsman, I really feel set with a budget setup like that..
I don't know about the whole amateur woodsman thing - over here, you'll see guys that have spent most all their lives in the woods both for fun and profit, and the most of them carry relatively inexpensive blades, like Fiskars hatchets and pretty basic carbon steel puukkos, sometimes even Moras if there's nothing else to go with. It's not the price that matters, it's the quality. A Fiskars hatchet may be cheap, but it's a good hatchet, and it'll last and last. Sure, if you pay three times as much, you can get a hatchet that holds a better edge and has a better geometry out of the box, but it probably won't be as tough (at least not in the handle) and it won't do the job three times better. There's nothing wrong with going with inexpensive tools as long as they are good tools. :thumbup:
Many people these days are elitists and show-offs, thinking they are somehow better if they own more expensive things. From this kind of thinking, it easily follows that "it must be better if it's more expensive", but that's not always the case, and then one must always consider the law of diminishing returns. If you have a cheap tool that does exactly what you want it to do, then why would you need a more expensive one that might do the job only slightly better?
All that said, many people do blades as a hobby, like I do. I bet many of us here don't need a fraction of the blades that we have, but we still love 'em. I find it fun to hoard various blades and then use them when I feel like it, having lots of options from the cheapo production knife to the expensive hand-made custom. Let's face it, we're not posting on a knife forum because we're right in the head, we're posting here because we're knife
nuts!
And now I have to say a word about Moras, too.

I've used a lot of Moras (like pretty much any Finn who has actually ever done anything with their hands), and while they're excellent for their price, there are tools that are much better (and a lot more expensive, of course). In my experience, practically any decent Scandi knife beats a Mora in cutting and slicing, edge retention and sometimes toughness as well (only sometimes, because unlike most Scandis, there's nothing about the Mora that's meant to be pretty, it has been designed for one thing alone, to be the ultimate low price disposable "use 'em hard and throw 'em away when they break" knife). Let's take my Tommipuukkos, for example. All hand-made, and all will cut and slice better than any Mora I've ever used, and hold their edge far longer, too. It's always seemed to me that Moras are immensely overrated outside Scandinavia, likely because especially in America it seems to be fashionable for even small knives to be made extremely thick and cumbersome, and this then leads into people wondering how well a Mora cuts by virtue of having a thin blade and light weight, and no godawful choil to hinder work. According to my experience, there are many knives that will do basic cutting tasks better than a Mora, and even more knives that will do abusive beating tasks better than a Mora. There's one thing that Moras are best at, and that is exactly the thing they were designed for - to be disposable, cheap beaters, that you can carelessly use for whatever you can imagine to want, from normal cutting tasks to prying nails off boards in construction work, and then discard and get another one when they break. Anyone who thinks Moras are somehow unusually great cutters or slicers would do well to try a quality puukko or indeed any relatively thin-bladed knife of reasonable edge geometry and design (no choils for things to keep jamming into). In the end, it's a question of whether or not you want to be pay for having a better knife. It's like with the hatchet - are you satisfied with the Fiskars, or do you have to have the GB? What works for you... Personally, I like to try all kinds of things, just so I'll know what actually is best (for me) and what's worst.