The good and the bad...

Joined
Jun 18, 2000
Messages
10,761
This is just a quick list of "the good" and "the bad" of some knives that I own.
These are just my own opinions and not to be taken as undisputable facts.
Your experience might differ--and that's okay.

Spyderco Atlantic Salt, yellow handle plain-edge:
The good:
Very light-weight.
Comfortable handle.
Easy to open because of the large thumb-hole.
Very secure grip due to the curves, the choil, and the texturing.
The straight-edge sheepsfoot blade makes for easy sharpening.
H-1 steel, FRN handle, and titanium clip equals RUST PROOF.

The bad:
The ridges cut in the blade for grip are too sharp (easily fixed with a file).
It appears cheap (just like most plastic handle knives).
No liners.
The H-1 blade-steel shows scratches and wear marks rather easily.

The balance:
An awesome knife for light-to-medium work (if you like the sheepsfoot blade--and I do)!
Spyderco has some real winners with the Salt series.
It's the perfect knife for light summer clothing and sport activities (biking, swimming, jogging, etc).
http://spyderco.com/catalog/details.php?product=172



Spyderco Salsa, green aluminum combo-edge:
The good:
The Compression-lock seems very secure and strong.
The Cobra-hood opens the knife with ease, and it makes a great thumb-rest too.
The handle construction seems very strong.
The full flat grind on the blade is very nice.

The bad:
The "salsa" pepper logo looks a little silly.
The blade is too broad with not enough point, and it's too short for a combo-edge.
The handle should be about 1/4" longer to be truly comfortable.
Takes up alot of room in the pocket for such a short-bladed knife.
I've come to dislike the Compression-lock--it just is'nt the easiest to operate with one hand.
I sometimes get a small pinch from the Compression-lock when I'm opening the blade.

The balance:
Almost a good knife.
The titanium version might solve some of the problems, but the blade is still too broad and stubby.
The overall design does have alot of potential, minus the Compression-lock.



Spyderco Military, black S30V plain-edge:
The good:
The S30V really is as great as everyone says.
The blade shape and design, combined with the full flat grind, makes this a knife a real pleasure to use.
The handle is comfortable and is large enough for any hand.
The G-10 scales are very grippy (they actually grip you right back).
It's surprisingly light-weight for such a large folder.
It's very easy to open due to its liner-lock and ball-detent design, and the huge thumb-hole.

The bad:
The liner-lock.
Yes, it does work, but this knife practically begs for a better lock.
Dual liners would really make this one more substantial.
Beefier spacers would be nice also.

The balance:
I would keep the liner-lock and add the LAWKS system, and add another nested liner--that would make it nearly perfect.
Or give it a better lock like the Ball-bearing-lock.
http://spyderco.com/catalog/details.php?product=114



Spyderco D'Allara Rescue:
The good:
Seems like a very strong knife due to the dual steel liners and thick scales.
The texturing affords a very secure non-slip grip.
It's comfortable to use.
Extremely easy to open.

The bad:
It's heavy.
The lock is difficult to unlock (maybe my fingers are too fat).
It's very bulky and really fills the pocket.
It's heavy.
There is no plain-edge option available.
The handle might be too thick for smaller hands.
Oh yeah, it's heavy.
Actually it is'nt THAT heavy, but the design and short blade makes it seem heavier that it really is.
The blade seems a tad short for such a bulky knife.

The balance:
This knife design has plenty of potential but the current version is just too bulky.
I have read that Spyderco is working on an improved drop-point version--it should be very interesting.
http://spyderco.com/catalog/details.php?product=35



Benchmade 720 Pardue, aluminum scales plain-edge:
The good:
The Axis-lock!
154CM blade-steel.
An extremely strong folder.
Comfortable handle unless you have large hands.
Nice flat saber-ground blade.
Classy appearance.

The bad:
The lack of texturing makes it somewhat slippery (but easy on the pockets).
It seems rather heavy for a knife this size.
The black coating on the aluminum scales shows every scratch and ding.
Handle could be about 1/4" longer for total comfort.
The blade is maybe just a bit too thick.

The balance:
Overall, a great knife.
It's solid, strong, and reliable, and looks good too.
Too bad the handle is'nt just a bit longer with tip-down carry.


Benchmade 551 Pardue Griptilian, plain-edge drop-point:
The good:
The Axis-lock!
An excellent blade shape and design--probably my very favorite (it's perfect for an EDC).
The handle is very comfortable to use.
The knife is the perfect size for an EDC--not too large and not too small, not too light and not too heavy.
The 440C seems to be a nice compromise between edge retention and corrosion resistance (although S30V would be better).

The bad:
The handle scales.
They look and feel cheap--they even sound cheap.
Somehow, they feel and look even cheaper than the FRN that Spyderco uses on the Endura.
And despite the texturing, they're still somewhat slippery.
The knife does'nt balance very well--it is rather "blade heavy".

The balance:
This is an excample of the where the materials don't live up to the design.
Tip-down carry option would be great.
http://www.benchmade.com/products/product_detail.aspx?model=551



CRKT Nealy Pesh Kabz, plain-edge:
The good:
Very strong construction.
The plastic scales look nice with subtle texturing.
The LAWKS goes a long ways in dispelling my liner-lock worries--it's simple and effective.
In fact, I wish that all liner-locks had the LAWKS system.
The flipper is terrific--it's no wonder that they have become so popular.
The ball-detent is the strongest that I have ever used!
There's no way that this one is going to open by accident.

The bad:
AUS-6 blade-steel.
The handle is just about 1" too short.
The pocket-clip digs in to my palm when using the knife.
The ridges on the flipper are too sharp (easily fixed with a file).
The blade.
This is the strangest blade design that I have ever used.
The last inch of the blade is unsharpened and is very thick.
It's almost like a knife blade and a marlin-spike all in one.

The balance:
Weird.
Just plain out weird.


Well, that's all for now but I will be adding more knives later.
And once again, these are just my opinions.

Allen.
 
Great info. Thanks for posting. You would think that major manufacturers would be able to put a coating of some sort (other than anodized) on aluminum handle scales that has better scratch resistence. I'm sure the gunmakers who use aluminum in their products (clips, etc.) have figured it out long ago.
 
They look and feel cheap--they even sound cheap.
Somehow, they feel and look even cheaper than the FRN that Spyderco uses on the Endura.
And despite the texturing, they're still somewhat slippery.

That was exactly my first impression too. Here's what I wrote this April in a brief review:
The lock design makes the knife worth $60, but I wish the handles were a different material. "Clicking" the handle with a fingernail makes a very chinzy and hollow sound, like cheap plastic. I'm sure it's plenty durable for my needs, but I'd rather it was the same material as the Spyderco Endura/Delica, or a 'grippy' rubber like a Gator.

Funny thing is, I've read other peoples' similar comments many times after buying my Griptillian. Oh well, I bought the knife for the mechanism, not the handles.

-Bob
 
Bob W,
I did the same thing as you did--I bought it for the axis-lock.

Maybe Benchmade WANTS it to feel, look, and sound cheap so that we will upgrade to G-10 or aluminum once we've been hooked on the axis-lock!

It worked on me.
Now I have a 720 and I'm looking for a 710 or a 941.

I also have to admit that I'm vain and shallow.
I will not carry the 551, although it's a great cutter, simply because of its cheap appearance (but I will carry my Spyderco Atlantic Salt. It makes no sense, does it?).

Allen.
 
The Elishewitz designed 690, is by far the best knife benchmade has ever produced. I have two versions of it and of course this is just my opinion.
 
Here are a few more...

Benchmade 625 Crawford Leopard, blue anodized plain-edge:
The good:
ATS-34 blade-steel.
Flat-ground drop-point blade.
Extremely comfortable handle design.
The holes in the handle makes it non-slip despite being made of aluminum.
Deep pocket-carry clip design.

The bad:
It's a liner-lock without LAWKS.
The clip is very tight.
No forward guard.
The stop-pin is not screwed in to the handles.
Not much belly for deep slices.

The balance:
This is one large, tough, yet elegant knife.
The handle cannot be beat in the "comfortable to use" arena.
And the blade design is terrific for point work--I can always use the tip with exact precision.
It's really too bad that Benchmade discontinued this one.
I would love to see it come back with the Axis-lock!


CRKT Carson M18-02, plain-edge with black G-10 inserts:
The good:
Very strong construction.
The fit-and-finish well exceeds what the price range would indicate--nearly flawless.
The swedged spear-point (with slight recurve) is strong.
The "Carson flipper" works great.
Comfortable handle.
The LAWKS system (see the Pesh Kabz review).
The ball-detent is very strong.
The G-10 inserts look very nice and feel good too, all while giving you a better grip.

The bad:
AUS-8 blade-steel, which is'nt really bad at all.
The locking-liner is a little too abrasive.
The thumbstuds/blade-stops are too abrasive.
The handle is just slightly too short.
No rear handle guard to keep the handle from slipping out of a wet grip.

The balance:
A great design from Carson, but the M21 is a better overall design IMO.



CRKT Walker BladeLOCK, plain-edge:
The good:
Strong construction.
Nice fit and finish.
Strong lock.
Thick strong blade tip.
Locks closed as well as open.

The bad:
Blade tip too thick for precise work.
Not enough belly on the blade.
AUS-6 blade-steel.
Uncomfortable to use.
Clip design is'nt the best and digs into the palm.
Very heavy considering the size of the knife.

The balance:
Overall, a good effort that allows the average Joe to check out an interesting lock design without having to buy one of Mr. Walker's custom-made knives.
Maybe the BladeLOCK 2 addressed some of the problems?

That's all for now but I'll post more later.


Happy hunting (or fishing...),
Allen
 
Hey Allen, how's the edge retention on your Atlantic salt. Is it on par with AUS-6? Better? Worse?
 
Truthfully, I have'nt cut anything tougher than some thick paper and some tape--and I have'nt needed to sharpen it yet either.

Maybe I'll do some testing next week.

Allen.
 
Okay, I'm back with some more totally biased opinions...

CRKT S-2, plain-edge:
The good:
ATS-34 blade-steel.
Titanium handle.
Strong frame-lock.
Nice drop-point blade design.
Open construction makes cleaning a breeze.
Very understated appearance.

The bad:
Lock pinches when closing.
Slight vertical blade movement.
Clip is too sharp at the end.
Single thumb-stud.

The balance:
While certainly not a Sebenza in fit-and-finish or ergonomics, it is very well constucted and will last forever.
The locking-bar pinch when unlocking is the real deal breaker here--somehow the tang always catches my finger.


Camillus CUDA Darrell Ralph EDC, plain-edge:
The good:
Very nice design.
Simple yet attractive.
Open construction makes for easy cleaning.
Strong frame-lock.
154CM blade-steel.
Nice recurved blade with lots of belly for slicing.
Tip-down carry.

The bad:
Holes in clip and handle are somewhat aggressive on clothing.
Blade not pointy enough.
Handle is not long enough and a bit on the thin side.

The balance:
A very nice small knife.
If the handle were just 1/2" longer, and it had a pointier blade, it would be awesome.
http://www.camillusknives.com/1mainframe.htm?cuda/index.shtml~main



CRKT Elishewitz E-Lock, black handle plain-edge Wharncliffe blade:
The good:
Very clever lock design that is very easy to use and seems very strong too.
Wharncliffe blade is wicked sharp.
Attractive appearance.
Strong construction all around.
Comfortable in the grip.

The bad:
The thumb-step(?) sucks! It is hard to open the blade with this step thingy--although you can hold the lock open and flick the blade out, bypassing the thumb-step altogether.
I'm glad that the E-lock Starlight has a flipper.
The handle is just a tiny bit short.
And the handle is just a tiny bit too thick on the pivot end.
I can see how the lock could be accidentally disengaged depending on the grip.
The blade-steel (AUS-8), while not that bad, could be better.

The balance:
Very interesting knife.
Falls short in a few areas but still a rather stout and effective small cutter.
The E-lock definitely has potential and I expect it to be found on more knives in the future--it might be the only real contender to the Axis-lock, IMHO.
http://www.crkt.com/elock.html



Spyderco Keating Chinook II, plain-edge:
The good:
Extremely strong.
Very reliable lock-back design.
Very strong blade design.
Very comfortable in the hand (THE MOST COMFORTABLE I OWN).
S30V blade-steel is awesome.
The knife can be oriented tip-up, tip-down, left, or right.
Dual steel skeletonized liners.
Very sturdy construction throughout.
G-10 scales.

The bad:
Rather heavy.
Blade is perhaps a bit too up-swept.
This is a large knife, no doubt about it, and it takes up alot of pocket space.

The balance:
One of Spyderco's very best knives IMO.
And one of the very best production knives bar none!
If there were someway to shave just a couple more onces off the weight (maybe titanium liners and back-spring?), and make the blade just a tad less upswept and a tad less thick, it would be THE ONE.
http://spyderco.com/catalog/details.php?product=22


Well, that's all for tonight.

Rest easy,
Allen.
 
OK, can I play? :D

Camillus Cuda Quik-Action small tanto PE:
After nearly 2 years of hard use.

Good:
Nice tough 154CM blade. (Never chipped, never rolled, just dulled.)
Reliable linerlock.
Unbelievably thick, stong sabre ground blade.
No holes and thumbstuds on the blade, so they don't interfere cutting.
Unique opening mechanism.
Lightweight.
Non slipping G10 handle.
Phosphorous bronze washers.
Smooth action.
No backspacer, easy to clean.
Sturdy tanto point. (I love tantos, YMMV)
Satin finish.
Fairly comfortable grip for it's size.

Bad:
It is not a framelock.
The screws are epoxied in, hard to disassamble.
Sometimes it is just too small! (Blade is under 3).
Liners are prone to rust.
Bladeplay. Vertical and horizontal.
 
This is a very useful thread! :thumbup:

What'd be great is if we had a database of personal reviews of each knives. That'd sure help other people shopping around for the next knife. :)
 
My latest purchase...

Benchmade 880 Elishewitz Darkstar, plain-edge:
The Good:
Excellent construction and attention-to-detail.
Very attractive knife (IMHO).
G-10 scales with traction grooves and "star" cutout.
Dual titanium liners, anodized gold.
Pocket-clip position lets knife ride deep in pocket.
ATS-34 blade-steel.
3.75" dagger-style blade looks gentlemanly and dangerous all at the same time.
Dual thumbstuds.
Rather light weight for a large folder (3.70 oz).

The Bad:
The handle is designed so that the liners protrude beyond the scales on the bottom of the handle--they sometimes dig in to the palm a bit when gripped tightly.
The G-10 scales could be abit more rough to offer a better grip--right now they are a little slick.
The pocket-clip allows for only one carry option: right-handed, tip-down (luckily that is what I prefer, but it leaves you lefties out).
I would prefer the LAWKS on all of my liner-locks.

The Balance:
Overall, a great knife design with a fairly long history (it evolved from the Elishewitz designed Sentinel).
This is one of those knives that manages to combine a classy and gentlemanly appearance with tough tactical/working performance.
I like it very much so far--and just like many other knives that I really like, it is discontinued!


Allen.
 
After a severe case of "Buck fever"....

Cabela's Alaskan Guide Buck 110 Folding Hunter:
The Good:
Simply beautiful.
Very strong construction.
Very comfortable to hold and use.
S30V blade-steel heat-treated by Mr. paul Bos!
Very strong and secure lock.
Titanium Aluminum Nitride coating on the blade is very attractive and helps prevent corrosion and wear.
"Edge2X geometry" and the high hollow-grind makes for a very sharp knife indeed.
Beautiful leather sheath.
Great price of approx. $73.00 shipped.

The Bad:
It is a VERY HEAVY folder.
No clip and requires a belt pouch/sheath.
Brass bolsters show fingerprints and also tarnish.
The "Alaskan Guide" logo on the blade distracts from the overall beauty of the knife.
There is a slight amount of blade side-to-side wiggle when the blade is folded closed--I've noticed that most 110's have this.

The Balance:
If you like the classic Buck 110, then you will LOVE the Alaskan Guide 110.
It is a wonderful design that has been around for over thirty years.
Despite the heavy weight of this knife, you cannot help but love it--and the weight is really no worse than a full-sized multi-tool.
If you don't own one, you're really missing out.
http://www.cabelas.com/cabelas/en/t...com/products/Cpod0027310.jsp&_requestid=37876




Buck 560 XLTi, black handle and black blade (now discontinued):
The Good:
Uses the same nice high hollow-grind that the Buck 110 is famous for.
The all titanium handle is much lighter-weight than the traditional Buck 110.
Very strong construction and lock.
Finger-grooves and handle "divots" make the titanium handle very secure with no slipping at all.
Very nice fit-and-finish.
Wonderful balance (possible the best balanced folder that I have used).

The Bad:
The 420HC blade-steel used by Buck is not horrible, but a better steel would be great (luckily, you can send the knife back to Buck and get an upgrade to BG-42 or ATS-34 for about $35.00).
No clip and requires a sheath or pocket carry.
The handle does'nt fill the hand quite as well as the traditional 110.

The Balance:
One of my favorite knives--even with the 420HC!
I'm going to send it back to Buck and have a BG-42 blade installed, and then I might look in to getting a pocket-clip attached.
It is an awesome knife and one that I highly recommend, if you can find one.


I'll post some more later.
And I've added a few links to some of the knives (or variations of the knives).

Allen.

Update: I never did send the 560 back to Buck for a better blade-steel.
Instead, I traded it for another knife on the Exchange forum.
I have now ordered a Custom Shop Buck 110 with asian water-buffalo scales, BG-42 blade, nickle-silver bolsters, and finger-grooves!
 
CRKT Nealy Pesh Kabz, plain-edge:

I bought one of these from ebay, and I really don't know what to do with it!! To cheap to be a collectors knife, to weird to be carried. Seems to be fairly useless as a edc. At least it was cheap.......
 
Buck 112 Ranger, with finger-grooves:
The Good:
The same strong and attractive construction as the classic Buck 110.
The handle fills the hand in a good and comfortable way.
The finger-grooves help prevent slippage.
The high hollow grind slices like crazy.
The fit-and-finish is much higher than the price would indicate.

The Bad:
Too heavy for such a short blade.
The finger-grooves could crowd the fingers of a person with large hands.
Not well balanced (too butt heavy).
420HC blade-steel could be better.
No clip.

The Balance:
IMO, if you're going to carry a folder that weighs over 5 oz. in a belt pouch, then you may as well carry one with a longer blade.
http://www.buckknives.com/catalog/detail/227/238



Spyderco Delica, black-blade plain-edge:
The Good:
VG-10 blade-steel.
Black coating does'nt show fingerprints as bad as a polished blade.
Very light-weight.
Good pointy blade for fine tip-work.
Textured FRN affords a nice non-slip grip.

The Bad:
Handle is a bit too short and thin for long-term comfort when using.
The short handle combined with the blade "hump" forces the thumb in an awkward position.
Not enough belly for great slicing.

The Balance:
A great and handy light-weight folder for everyday light cutting.
Not the greatest slicer, nor the most comfortable folder to use, but its light weight and the pocket-clip allows for it to be carried everywhere, even in light-weight summer clothing.
 
SOG Sculptura:
The Good:
Nice appearance--it looks interesting and modern.
The lock is very easy to manipulate because they protrude quite abit from the handle.
The knife is rounded making it very "snag free", it would probably be good for pocket-carry with the clip removed.
Nice flat-ground wide drop-point blade.
The Arc-lock seems every bit as strong and secure as the Axis-lock.
There is not a single ounce of blade-play in any direction.

The bad:
The handle is very small and the tapered design only allows for me to get two fingers on it comfortable--well actually only semi-comfort.
This makes it difficult to hold and cut with.
The plastic scales have small cracks at the butt rivet and the mid-handle rivet and they feel cheap.
When the blade is closed the lock rattles when you shake it.

The balance:
Inspiring appearance.
Cheap plastic scales.
Interesting lock.
Okay to look at but terrible to actually use.

http://www.sogknives.com/sculpt.htm




CRKT Rollock: gray scales plain-edge:
The good:
Looks very cool, and like a puzzle-box, it makes you want to figure out how to open it.
Nice clip design.
Neat and clever opening method, but somewhat awkward.
Rather comfortable for such a small knife.
Nice flat-ground drop-point blade--it cuts rather well.
The dual steel liners and the lock gives this knife a pleasant amount of heft.
No blade-play in any direction.
Even if the lock failed for some reason, it cannot fold on to your fingers since it does'nt "fold".

The bad:
Opening is a bit awkward.
Takes two hands to close the blade.
You have to grip the sides of the blade to close it and then you have finger-prints all over the blade.
One scale cracked and I had to glue it.
It's just a bit too small for a comfortable grip.

The balance:
Not a bad little knife at all for a two-handed-knife.
The lock gives it great "gadget appeal".
I would like to see one about an inch longer with micarta scales and premium blade-steel.

The new Rollocks:http://www.crkt.com/rollock2.html




Spyderco Pacific Salt: black handle plain-edge:
The good:
Light-weight.
Very easy to open due to the very large thumb-hole, the large blade, and the perfectly tuned lock tension.
The handle is very comfortable and secure and is large enough for nearly anyone's hand.
H-1 blade-steel and pins and locks, plus a titanium pocket-clip makes this knife very water friendly and virtually rust-proof.
I like the blade design very much (hollow-grind, decent amout of belly, nice strong tip, very sharp).
Having used the Salt 1 and the Atlantic Salt for a while, H-1 is quickly becoming my favorite blade-steel.
It obtains a very sharp edge with very little effort on the Sharpmaker, and it holds it for a respectable amount of usage, and I have'nt experienced a single chip.

The bad:
Not much bad to declare...the H-1 does show wear and scratch marks rather easily.
The unlined FRN scales appear to be "cheap plastic" so you will not impress anyone with the Pacific Salt's appearance.

The balance:
IMO, The Pacific Salt is one of the very best knives in production.
The only thing that would make it better would be a titanium handle!

http://spyderco.com/catalog/details.php?product=170

http://spyderco.com/catalog/details.php?product=128


Later,
Allen.
 
Back
Top