The iceman's tools.

Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
17,677
Yesterday, the better half and I went down to the Smithsonian Museum in Washington D.C. There were some new exibits at the museum of natural history we wanted to see, and one in particular I wanted to see. The iceman's tools. This is the 5,000 year old guy that was frozen in the glacier in Austria.

They have a nice little exibit about him in the exibit hall dedicated to the rise of western civilization in Europe in the noelithic thru the copper age.

I was impressed with a couple of things. One was how small and almost insignificant looking his tools were. His flint knife was only about 1 1/2 to 1/3/4 inches in length. The first little bit was broke off, they think in the last fight he had just before he fled into the mountains, but from the profile of the blade, it looks like maybe 1/4 of and inch is missing. It was bound into a ash handle with what looked like sinew, and the whole thing was overall smaller than a sak when open.

He had a little bone awl for I guess field repairs of hide clothing. It was also very small, maybe 2 inches in length. There was a hunk of dried tree fungus that was tinder, and there was a small flint scraper. The maniken they had standing there dressed in the clothing, was well done. Fur leggings, fur coat, and fur hat, leather ankle high shoes stuffed with dry grass. All in all, it looked like he was well dressed for harsh weather. He had been in the prosess of making a new bow and arrows.

But best of all was the ax. He was carrying a copper ax about the size if a 14 inch Fiskars hatchet, but with a much narrower smaller head. This was bound into a long wood handle with sinew.

Copper ax and small flint knife. They must have served him well, because he was in his early 40's, which was old by his era's standards. All his gear was small and light, not unlike a modern backpackers tools. Standing there looking at his stuff, it made me think about our stuff.

The fact that he died, was due to the arrow just under his shoulder blade, and he'd been shot in the back not long before he died. He'd been in a really good fight just before he fled inot the mountains, he had a cut across his right index finger and knuckel, another deep cut across the palm of the hand, both cuts leaving marks in the bone from the serrated edge of a flint knife. That he got away from his attackers was verrified by the fact that he was found 5,000 years later with his copper ax, that would have been a treasure to someone back then. Medical experts say he probably bled to death from the arrow wound in his back that was close to he heart.

So in the end, we have a guy who was from the north side of the alps, (southern Germany or Austria)that was on the south side of the alps, (Northern italy) traveling what was long distances in those days, well beyond his own turf, with a hatchet, small knife, and a bow. A little waist pouch held a few items like a tinder and fire kit, mushroom for medicinal use(?) awl, a flint tool or two.

Looking at the stuff we carry these days, I feel like a piker.

But he must have been one heck of a tough survivor; he has a heck of a knife fight getting cut and breaking the tip off his own knife, gets shot in the back with a fatal shot, and still outruns his attackers to escape in the mountains, only dying later from delayed effect of an arrow in the back.

Guess they made em tougher in those days.
 
Never heard the whole story before, that amazing he was in his 40's.
 
that is awesome. it was closed when i went last year but the native american museum next door was pretty awesome too. i really might have to get up there and see that soon!
 
I remember reading how the anthropologists theorized that the copper axe was not only a functional tool, but also something like a badge of honor or authority, indicating that this guy was someone important among his people.
 
I find it really interesting that considering the time frame, the tools we use today haven't changed all that much. Cool Story!


I just looked him up on Wikipedia. You guys should read it. Its amazing how much they could tell about him. They could tell his diet, where he ate his last meal, how many times he had been sick in his last 6 months. There is just so much information for such an old mummy.
 
Last edited:
I find it really interesting that considering the time frame, the tools we use today haven't changed all that much. Cool Story!

Thats exactly one of the things that struck me as I looked at the stuff. Here's this guy traveling on foot, through cold late ice age Europe, far from home and living off the land maybe, and his main tools are a small copper ax the size of a tomahawk, and a small maybe 2 inch flint knife. Oh, and a bow for hunting.

Makes me wonder if I really need anything but my sak in a pocket and a Fiskars or GB hatchet.

And chuck, I noticed the same thing at the Native American museum. The tools and weapons they had for thousands of years were so darn simple. I guess it really is what's upstairs that counts.
 
I got my anthropology degree in 1975. At the time, physical anthropology was so new that our department had to make special arrangements with another school to accommodate the 1 student who wanted to pursue it. The advancements in the past 30 years are remarkable.

As far as Oetzi's tools, from personal experience, I do not get out as much as I would like. I am lucky enough to have a wooded lot behind our house that the neighbors let us walk on. They are also kind enough to extend the "by hook or by crook" rule. Any dead falls, dead limbs etc. that I am able to harvest by hand or pulling with a rope (hook or crook - no cutting tools) is up for grabs. I practice harvesting wood and cutting it into camp size pieces. I started with a large heavy knife, chopping and batoning. I soon saw that there were other more efficient ways of cutting wood. A small camp saw and a Gerbers pack ax work great. In addition to being great for limbing and splitting, I am learning how to use the pack ax to carve and slice kindling. My wife refuses to let me use it to chop vegetables - so I have to wait until she is out of the kitchen to hone my skills.

Again from an anthropological perspective, I think that many of us carry on a tradition that Oetzi appears to have observed. Just like his copper ax, Our bushcraft knives are a totem or charm as well as a tool. I do just as well with a saw, a small hatchet and a SAK. However, I feel naked w/out by bushcraft knife.

Here is a good link with additional information on Oetzi:

http://www.viewzone.com/oetzi.html
 
Just thought of one more thing on this:

Since this guy survived in this lifestyle with similar tools to us, we should take this as a lesson that mental preparedness and practice of skills is what will keep you alive, not the latest and greatest gadgets and tools.
 
If I came upon a discovery like that , there would be a moral battle going on. A devil on one shoulder saying take that stuff, and an Angel on the other saying "you better report this."
 
If he had a Busse he could have just turned and fought the glacier. :D

In all seriousness, the information that we've gotten from just this one man is fascinating. What I take away from the story is that I truly do not practice my wilderness skills enough; this guy was out there living on his wits everyday, not just on the occasional weekend getaway and after-work hike.
 
We had an iceman repro on display in Sydney. Interesting if a little gruesome. Don't remember the harp but if he had one he may have been a travelling minstrel.

The size and quantity of tools should not suprprise. Our ancestors did not work 40 hour weeks with 3 weeks annual holidays and weekends off. They tended to tell time by the seasons - not a watch hand. Their priorities and timeframes are not the same as what most Westerners would consider to be the norm today. This is evidenced by our own indigenous Aboriginals even 200+ years after European colonisation.

I am sure that they valued their stoneage tools, but because of the brittle nature of the stone and the speed with which a new one could be made (given the right materials and a skilled toolmaker) they would have been the equivalent of Mora's rather than Busse's - very effective but not heartbreaking if broken or lost. Also, having to hike everywhere and live off the land, fight bandits and trade skills and/or goods would probably be an incentive to travel as light as possible.
 
regarding the age thing- I was in a prolonged debate about the rise of agriculture and adult disease a couple years ago. I have to do this from memory, but IIRC, once you got past a certain childhood age (there were significant drop offs at around 5 and mid teens, I think), in most pre or non agricultural cultures the adult life expectancy was in the 50s. (there's a certain amount of horitculturalism and pastoralism in here, what changed with the ag boom was the large scale farming idea, primarily of cereals.)

From an evolutionary perspective our lifespans evolved long before agriculture.

Early agricultural societies saw an average DROP in life expectancy for adults, but also saw a larger population increase and an overall (once you get rid of epidemic disease) lowering of infant and childhood mortality over time. There's a bit of debate about the mortality demographics there, as some cultures didn't consider a child to be "real" for a certain period of time due to high infant mortality rates and a trend to under report that goes back quite a ways in many cultures.

In any case, the death rate between early adulthood and what we'd term middle age was quite low. If you made it to adulthood, you could generally look forward to several decades of fun!
 
I was reading somewhere that the grass poncho he wore or maybe it was his shoes or both was similar to what was being worn by people in the area up until the early 1900s.

Chad
 
Back
Top