The Making of a Traditional Knife-loving, Steel Snob, an Autobiography

Joined
Apr 21, 2006
Messages
141
It is usually in the General Forum that we hear talk of steel snobs with their super steels. In my case, it is quite the opposite. I went from someone who almost exclusively used stainless steel knives and never gave a single thought to the type of steel in a knife, to someone who now scorns stainless steels and can only enjoy a knife if it has 1095 steel. A sad tale.

I will hopefully turn 50 this year, so that means I graduated high school in 1984 and a Merchant Marine academy in 1988. That puts me in a generation that grew up on stainless knives. I’m not some old timer that sat in a rocking chair on the porch of general store, whittling away with his old trapper. Carbon steel knives were around when I was a kid, but they were marketed less and less. I was aware of the difference between stainless and carbon blades because my Dad had one of those WWII US Navy stacked-leather handle, fixed blades that he kept in his workshop. It had a very dark gray patina with lots of pepper spots, so I knew that stainless blades didn’t really rust and the carbon steel ones would.

My first knife was issued to me at the Merchant Marine academy. It was one of those stainless camp style knives made by Camillus and marked “US”. My mother then gave me a Buck sailors knife with a marlin spike. I used that Buck throughout my academy days and for several years when I started sailing on commercial ships. It was also during college that I acquired my first two traditional knives. I didn’t know they were considered traditional knives, to me they were just “jack knives”. Any non-lockback folding knife was a “jack knife” to me at that time. I had purchased a Camillus Barlow and a Schrade 194OT (I still have them). I just sort of liked them and I wasn’t even aware that they had 1095 blades. In fact, I was somewhat disappointed when they started to rust.

At the time, most American merchant seamen carried a lockback style folder, so I started acquiring some of those types of knives such as Uncle Henrys, Gerbers, Bucks, Kershaws, Browning, etc., as well as a couple of Leatherman multi-tools and SAKs. It was during this time that I realized that I sort of liked knives and I started to acquire more than I could ever use. Most seaman would only buy a new knife when they either lost or broke one. I wasn’t a collector, but I liked to visit sporting goods stores when ashore and pick up a Buck or Schrade that looked interesting to me. These were mostly smaller gentlemen-style lockbacks. I was only vaguely aware of the different traditional patterns. When I was younger, I did know what a Barlow knife was (most likely because they were often stamped “Barlow” on the bolster) and I remember seeing knives in the glass display cases, labeled as a “stockman”. Since I grew up in Rhode Island and that isn’t exactly cattle country, I remember thinking a stockman knife was a knife that would be useful to people who worked in warehouses and had to deal with stocking products or equipment. Embarrassing, I know.

It wasn’t until around 2004 or 2005 that I started to get interested in traditionals. I guess I can thank the internet for that and I started getting interested in Case knives. At that time, they had gone from a company that made working-man knives to one that mostly catered to collectors, offering endless variations of bone handles. I liked Case mini-trappers, so I started buying every combination they had, ending up with about 30 of them. At this point, they were all stainless and I still never gave a thought to the type of steel used. I was a member of the Case Collector’s club and spent a lot of time on their forum. This is where I would start to see posts of beautiful older Case knives with the red bone handles and 1095 blades. Perfect condition ones were terribly expensive on the big auction site, but I picked up a couple of non-mint knives here and there.

In 2006, I joined Bladeforums and that’s where it all started to go downhill. Seeing all of the beautiful vintage knives here made me start looking for them also on the auction sites. I learned about many manufacturers that I had never heard of, Keen Kutters, Kutmaster, Robeson, etc. I also learned that Schrade had once made knives other than brown sawcut delrin handled knives. I couldn’t afford the mint condition knives, so I started looking for diamonds in the rough, knives that had some rusting and pitting but had been sharpened little. I had bought a couple that were frozen shut with rust, but I enjoyed bringing them back to life as good users. I acquired some nice knives this way and I also got stuck with some turkeys that had no snap left in them.

When GEC started coming out with knives, I wanted some badly, but abstained for a few years because I considered them too expensive. I thought anyone that would pay more than $45 for a knife was crazy. A few years ago, I finally decided to take the plunge and then was upset for not getting in on them earlier, missing out on some great knives that can only be picked up on the exchange now, usually for much more than when new. GEC is pretty much all that I buy now but I still won’t buy a knife that costs more than $100. I don’t know when it happened, but when I look at my knife drawers that are full of stainless Case knives, I sort of shrug because they just don’t do anything for me. The only thing I have against them is my snobbery of stainless blades. I have even started giving them away to some non-knife friends because they are obviously useless cutting implements and being non-knife savvy people, they won’t know any better.

I’ve used stainless steel knives my whole life without complaint, using them to cut countless amounts of rope, packaging, boxes, scraping off old gaskets, etc. I want to change and go back to a time when I never considered the type of steel used. I am going to try, but it will be hard going. I want to enjoy those knives again. Anyone have a similar tale?

Sorry for the long post from a notorious lurker who has only made 100 posts in the last ten years.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If I may make a suggestion? To get back to not caring what the steel is (or back to using and enjoying stainless steel blades) without bankrupting the bank, give the Rough Riders a go. They have patterns in regular production that others don't make or only make a limited run of for collectors (the Sunfish, comes to mind) and since you like Barlows ... well, Rough Rider has tiny , small, normal, daddy, and grand daddy size Barlows, with a multitude of handle materials. The small and normal are available with two blades (clip and pen) the others are single blade.
It is much easier (and cheaper) to get a Rough Rider Barlow than one by Case, as Case does not currently make that pattern. Not sure when Case dropped it.
Anyway, at $7 to $19 a pop, sometines with free shipping ... Rough Riders are hard to beat.
If you have not done so already , check out the Rough Riders and Related thread. It may take a couple days to go through all 150 plus pages, but it is time well spent.
 
I'm going through a similar change of heart, but rather successfully. I've been a Carbon Steel guy since I got here and realized I really liked those Old Timey knives that looked well cared for, but used..... that meant patina! I still prefer Carbon, but a few things have warmed me up to stainless steel.

Really good looking bone covers on Case's Pocket Worn Red knives (which I can't get in Carbon!!!)
Colored Alox Victorinox Knives
The Case/Bose Collaborations (which I don't own and only admire)
Buck Knives
Learning to be able to decently sharpen a knife.... That Case Surgical Stainless can get pretty dang sharp!
Using my knives in environments that aren't friendly to Carbon... I got a little spec of rust on my brand new Peanut while down in Key West... a spec of salty sand got on it!!!

Anyways, I happily accept stainless if everything else is nice.
 
I can definitely relate to what you're saying here. I don't have nearly the history with knives that you do, but I went through an abridged version of your journey. I carried a stainless knife for several years, and when it came time for me to look for a new one I didn't really understand why somebody would want a knife that wasn't stainless. Then I saw all of the beautiful pictures of the patina'd blades and decided that I was going to give carbon steel a try. Now, I'm drifting towards more corrosion resistant steels.

I think that step one is to identify why you're hung up on 1095. For me, I enjoy watching knives age and develop character. A steel like 1095 gives an instant gratification. Within days of carrying a knife with 1095 blades I can see it starting to change. When I'm carrying a knife to see if I like it I get that instant bond with 1095, which I did not get with stainless blades. That meant that in the initial testing phase I was finding that I liked my carbon bladed knives more than my stainless bladed ones. I have started making an effort to take a more long-term approach to judging my likes/dislikes in knives. I have found that D2 is a nice balance for me, in that it doesn't corrode on me but still develops a nice patina. I've found that the longer amount of time it takes for the patina to form leads to me appreciating the character even more. I haven't yet jumped into full stainless blades, but I can see how that might be possible again. One day at a time.
 
I am steel agnostic. As long as I can figure out how to keep it sharp and maintained, I'll carry and use it. I suppose more of my regularly carried knives are stainless, but that's not because I have some particular aversion to carbon. Just the way my rotation works out.
 
I don't consider myself a steel snob, though I don't buy knives with 420HC, 440A, and mystery stainless. These steels are chosen to cater to the lowest common denominator -- folks who don't take care of or know how to sharpen a knife, where ease of maintenance and sharpening is the primary consideration.

I have knives with different steels - ATS-34, 154CM, CPM154, S30V, BG-42, VG-10, 12C27, 1095, O1, W2, A2, 5160, Böhler K510. I haven't had problems with any of them, but I do consider a knife's intended use when looking at a blade's steel. I like carbon and tool steels for fixed blades and traditional knives, stainless for modern folders.
 
I was happy and content with my old Buck stockman and a SAK or two around. Got by for years, even decades just fine. Then I saw a copy of the first knife magazine I recall seeing in the mid 1970's. Knife World magazine out of Knoxville. It kindled some kind of knife accumulation trigger in me. A book didn't help, called The Gun Digest Book of knives" by Jack Lewis and BR Hughs. All kinds of knives I didn't know existed. It went downhill fast from there.

I think the 1980's was my heyday of knife accumulation, and experimentation. I tried them all. Sodbusters, trappers, barrows, some lock blades, customs. Even tried the samples in the dawn of the tactical thing in the late 1980's. No, it didn't take and I got rid of them pretty fast after a trial period.

After many years of indulgence, I sort of ended up right back where I started. A few pocketknives and SAK's around. At the hight of my knife obsession, I was a knife snob. If it wasn't a custom sheath knife like a Randall, or some high end folder like the old green and yellow box Puma's, I'd turn my nose up at it. But then I went back to my old Opinel and SAK, and a Case peanut. These days I carry a peanut and a small Leatherman. At least I made money on the Randall's and other customs.

It was a long strange trip inspired by media.
 
Why be concerned about the steel? The Case stuff gets plenty sharp, sharpens up easily, and holds its edge well. To me, it's just a matter of what kind of look you prefer. The stainless will stay shiny, and doesn't need much in the way of maintenance, whereas the CV will get a patina (some love it, some don't) and benefits from a bit of watching and a touch of oil, to make sure it doesn't start to rust. Either will cut beautifully and make for a serviceable and good-looking knife.
 
My own experience is a bit different. Although my first and only traditional pocket knife for many years was a stainless steel Swiss army knife, I had always favored Schrade's 1095 over their stainless (440A and 420HC) I considered their Uncle Henry knives inferior to their Old Timer knives for this reason. And to this day, I have never bought an Uncle Henry knife because of the blade steel. But avoiding "Schrade+" didn't necessarily guarantee that you were getting 1095. Near the end, Schrade swapped steel to stainless in some knives and that was a problem for me. It turns out they were hoping nobody would notice! Now, collectors have documented things but it was very confusing at the time.
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php/378164-Schrade-Blade-Steels
 
Great insight into your collecting background, Snipe, and thanks for sharing!

I guess I could be considered "steel agnostic" (great term!), too, or perhaps "steel apathetic". As one of the infamous signature lines here on BF implies: There's no such thing as the wrong steel, only the wrong application for the steel in question. Right now I'm carrying a stainless Barlow (there are corpses spinning in graves right now :p), a trapper in 1095 and a big congress with 4 blades all in D2. The variation in blade profiles (multiple sheepsfoots, multiple pens, a nice long clip, a stainless spear, and a carbon "one-armed jack" which serves as the spey) only adds to the versatility. I don't always consider the specific steel when choosing a carry, but I do pay it some mind when purchasing a knife that is intended to be a user. Still, in the end, a knife needs to be sharp and well-maintained, regardless of the composition of its blades. Advocating for one type of steel over another is silly -- it's best to just be knowledgeable in the various types of blade steels and use that knowledge to care for your knives.

Oh, and I love both my shiny stainless Wingen and my mottled patina'd CV Case blades equally. :p
 
Last edited:
Learning to be able to decently sharpen a knife...

I am good with 1095, O1, 3V and A2 (A2 is my favorite tool steel). However, I like 154CM and CPM154. I've got a couple slipjoints commissioned from custom makers in those steels. I am fine sharpening tool and carbon steels, but the super powder stainless steels are something else. If I let them get less than scary sharp, I need to take them to a maker or knife shop. It's the same concept for any steel, whether stainless or carbon.

While it may be heresy to some to get a slipjoint with super steels, I like them. The patterns, that half stop, worn bone handles. If the steel has a patina, even better. But it's not necessary.
 
I am good with 1095, O1, 3V and A2 (A2 is my favorite tool steel). However, I like 154CM and CPM154. I've got a couple slipjoints commissioned from custom makers in those steels. I am fine sharpening tool and carbon steels, but the super powder stainless steels are something else. If I let them get less than scary sharp, I need to take them to a maker or knife shop. It's the same concept for any steel, whether stainless or carbon.

While it may be heresy to some to get a slipjoint with super steels, I like them. The patterns, that half stop, worn bone handles. If the steel has a patina, even better. But it's not necessary.

I haven't messed with them too much, but the ones I have sharpened just seem to take more time.... same process though. Oh, having diamond stones I think helps.
 
Thanks for the comments. I understand what has been said about the Schrade+ stainless. I have a couple of Schrade and Uncle Henrys with that steel and I can't get a good edge on it no matter what I try. I have re-profiled them with Lanskys, used Croc Sticks and Spyderco Sharpmakers and still can't get a good edge. On the other hand, I used a giant Uncle Henry LB8 for many years on ships and it always cut very well. I also had a cheap zytel handled Schrade SP3 that took a wicked edge with its Schrade+ steel.

I have also been burned with the unmarked Schrade stainless. I once bought an un-used 34OT that was still in the blister packaging. The blades were not marked Schrade+ and the blister packaging even said it had carbon steel blades. It was definitely stainless though. It must have been from the final days of production.
 
For a long time I never gave much thought about the steel used in a knife.
In the late 60's I started out with Case CV, then I tried Case's SS.
The first steel upgrade were a couple of Old Timers with 1095, later I added a Camillus to the mix. 1095 was an improvement, it held an edge a bit better and was easier to sharpen. Easier for me anyway.

It wasn't until I started fishing more that I tried stainless again. Carbon and water don't mix. I remember the whole agonizing decision process, looking at Camillus and Bucks and wondering which steel would be best. Numbers like, 440A, 420HC meant nothing to me. This was the pre internet era aka stone age. Based on advise from my uncle and the mental flip of a coin I bought a buck.

I didn't like the grind on the newer bucks, so I started looking around again. When you look at knives on the internet, you find bladeforums. There's a wealth of information archived here. Steel is always mentioned, so then you (I) have to search steels. When I discovered Queen and D2, I spent a whole lot of time looking into D2. Some liked it & some hated it. I came to the conclusion that the people with the right tools to sharpen it loved it and those who weren't equipped to sharpen it, hated it.

So when I finally ordered the Queen, I ordered a KME diamond system. Since then I've added knives with I think 6 modern steels ranging from 440C to D2. None of the steels I have are “Super Steels” but they are stainless or almost stainless. To me form follows function and these new steels function very well. The function of a good steel and the beauty of a traditional pocketknife. For me, it just doesn't get any better.

Until I started lurking on bladeforums, I had never heard of the concept of a traditional steel. I used the steel that worked best for me, it was as simple as that. As long as it was a pocketknife like I was familiar with and not an over built over sized mall ninja special I was happy.

It's taken a long time to transition from whatever Case's CV is, to the newer steels. In the 60's I learned how to sharpen, 40 plus years later I learned how to sharpen all over again.
In the end I'm happy were I've ended up. :)
 
I suppose I could consider myself a steel snob of sorts, but the reality is I'll carry just about anything. I'm not a huge fan of D2, M390, and the other super hard steels mainly because they take too long for me to sharpen. I do have the right tools to sharpen, but with softer steels, I can get a crazy sharp edge a lot faster. I can dull any steel pretty quick and sharpening knives is not a favorite pastime of mine.

I used to be really anti 440A until I picked up a few European knives with it last year. With the right heat treat, it's really not that bad. I was pleasantly surprised with it. One European steel I really like is 12C27.

Carbon steel is fine and I really like 1095.
 
I remember growing up with the Old Timers and their patina, and as far as I knew, they were what you bought when you bought a knife. Then they went to stainless, and all I heard was "Get the carbon steel, the new stainless is junk". Only in the last 10 years did I take any kind of interest in pocket knives. Thank God for the internet.

I started reading about all the high end steels and reading test reports on their performance, which led me to modern knives. I bought a Leek with 14C28N, and some good sharpening stones, silicon carbide and diamond, and an Edge Pro. I still like the Leek for the blade shape and the steel, but once you take one look at the traditional forum, it's on!

I'm by no means a steel snob, I'm just "steel curious". Everyone looks for certain things in a new knife. I've narrowed it down to single blade, 3-1/2" closed, a blade with a usable tip, nice covers, and a steel that I don't have. It makes it hard to find a knife that I would want, and that works well with my budget.

I seem to be able to get D2 or CPM154 sharper easier than 1095 for whatever reason. The fact that they stay that way longer makes me like them.
And..... You can put your favorite one in a drawer and "cheat" on it with another, and it's all good.

Reminds me of a joke - What's the difference between a dog and a wife? With a dog, the later you come home at night, the happier they are to see you! :thumbup:
 
We all enjoy knives for different reasons. I really like to experience different performance with different steels and blade geometry etc. My current knives range from below 20$ to 100-200$, and honestly I like both of them. Sure the 20$ ones may not hold an edge that long, but I get to sharpen them more, and that brings me a lot more enjoyment than a 100$ knife that hasn't gone dull despite shredding through the really thick 3 layer cardboard. M390 is really tough, and I am very impressed, but I know if I used an opinel, I'm gonna have fun redoing that messed up edge. I guess I want the best of both worlds, the simple carbon steel designs with materials that were once alive, and the modern 'super steels' with all those weird polymerized materials.
 
Modified the title to remind folks where this thread is.

I'm a materials engineer, so pretty much by default I am a steel junky. I like trying different alloys. And I also use my knives for cutting plastics and for rough cutting chores. Having tried a number of non-stainless alloys, non-carbide containing stainless steels, carbide containing stainless steels, and PM steels. I've reached the conclusion that I prefer PM alloys, but a carbide containing alloy is still pretty good, and anything else is pretty much "good enough" if hardened to ~58-59. I lose interest if the alloy is hardened to a 55 or softer.

So that's what I like as far as steel goes. But, I've also come to the conclusion that traditional patterns are more useful to me than one-handers. And unless one pays an arm and a leg, that means lower performance alloys. I need my arms and my legs, so I go with what is commercially available. So I mostly end up with "good enough".
 
Fair warning, steel junkies: Case is now making a full-sized trapper with 154CM blades. Click here for more info.

-- Mark
 
Back
Top