- Joined
- Jul 30, 2006
- Messages
- 44,704
It's interesting you notice this. Axe's are often used as the example of a thick edge. I think this must come from most people being familiar with a splitting axe, and having never seen or used a dedicated felling or bucking axe. A dedicated felling axe in the hands of a skilled user can be thin enough to make my Delica blade a good comparison.
Also a bit of caution is necessary to make sure everyone is talking about the same thing. The OP seems to be talking about the angle of the edge bevels, while some others appear to mean the actual thickness of metal just behind the edge bevel. These 2 things are independent of each other, though both have a profound effect on how a knife/axe performs. I've put 10-12 degree bevels on edges 0.055" thick behind the edge, and 30 degree bevels on knives 0.005" thick behind the edge.
I took the original question to be the thickness of the blade just above the bevel, but, now that I re-read it, I think you are correct and he was talking about edge angles. You are right, different issues.
For me, edge angle is mostly dependent on how hard the blade is. The angle I grew up with was 22 1/2°. (mind you I'm talking early 70's and earlier.) Most knife companies went with that angle because the blades were mostly only hardened to 54-55 HRC. So the steel was not hard enough to support a thin edge. You needed more steel behind the edge to support it so that it would not bend. With the advent of newer alloys taken to a higher hardness, thinner edges become supportable.
So, I got up on my soapbox to say that I have some knives that are ~ 54-56 HRC and I tend to keep those at a 20° edge angle. (My 30-year old kitchen knives fall into that category.) I have other knives with blades hardened to the high 50's and even low 60's. Those I keep at 15° or thinner edge angle.