Thinking W worked!


It might have something to do with Balisongs. For example, perhaps Bush used a Balisong while torturing small animals?
 
Nah, it was more along the lines of him stuffing firecrackers up the anal tracks of frogs and other small animals, then watching them explode from within for laughs.

Very disgusting
smile.gif


 
Cpt....
you are stating that stuff like it's a bad thing, it kinda reminds me of my childhood in indiana
I mean i would never do anything like that, but he might have been in an expermental stage, give him a freakin' break
If I was held responsible for all the **** i did when i was younger, and for all the stuff i do now when i get older, i would never go anywhere, and neither would most people
get over the fact that people **** up when they are kids, they are allowed to, that's what being a kid is all about
tique out

keep thinking W dammit
 

Aw man, that is extremely revolting!! I dunno Tique, being a misfit as a child is one thing, blowing up animals leans more towards being seriously depraved!
 
>> Now, this thread has gotten way off topic and it really does belong in a different forum.

It does still relate to Balisong Knives though. Because it's really a federal law or rather the interpertation by customs of a federal law, that causes us to have so much trouble getting the knife we all seem to want to get our hands on.

I see a Federal Government, that basicly does whatever it wants to do, without having to be held accountable to anyone. As you say, if we can return some of that back to the local or state level, then you are going to start to give control of the government back to the people. I would have a much better chance of getting to the Governer of my state to discuss something that is of concern to me, then I would have of getting to a person of equal power in the Federal government. Elected officals, tend to be more responsive to the people, then appointed officals do. Esp. those who are appointed for life or who are going to hold the job as long as the person who appointed them is in office. Thanks, JohnR7
 
Re:Popular Vote

IMHO George W. WOULD have WON the popular vote if the election reporting had not swayed the election by calling FLA early. Why go out and battle the traffic, and who knows what, if Bush was called the winner?.... also look at the map of the U.S. by area the Red + Blue one from USA today... Bush had the MAJORITY. (sorry no link)
http://www.newsmax.com/showinsidecover.shtml?a=2000/11/27/222544

RE: recount in FLA. If GORE really wanted the "True" recount done why has the Florida Democratic Party filed a motion this AM to stop the Ballot inspection in Palm Beach by the court ordered watch dog group review of the ballots?

http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A63620-2000Nov27.html

Finally.. The population TODAY wants Bush in office over 92% in the latest pole want Gore to stand down.
http://www.newsmax.com/showinsidecover.shtml?a=2000/11/27/204851

After seeing Gore and the *whiny* Liberman behave the way they have, a re vote TODAY, nation wide, Bush would win BIG TIME.

Considering the fight George W had against big Hollywood $$, the liberal press and the free time given to the Dems (rosie macdonald etc.) George W kicked ass.

I personally think the Libertarian Party is the way to go. They will never win, but check out their stuff .. if they were in office you could own any knife you wanted and be able to carry it!http://www.harrybrowne.org/

I also believe Clinton+Gore should face charges that their administration traded U.S. national security to China in exchange for campaign cash, prosecutions for treason should follow. And..Bill Clinton should he be indicted for perjury and obstruction of justice along with a host of other crimes (misuse of power FBI files etc). They BOTH should be in prison.

Read "Unlimited Access" by Gary Aldrich former FBI Agent and find out what the Clinton + Gore administration is REALLY like!
wink.gif


whew... "I need a tylenol"

[This message has been edited by JohnInNH (edited 11-28-2000).]
 
The link you posted reported some 187,000 people *disenfranchised*. Assuming they are all republicans, Bush would still be behind Gore by about 100,000 in the popular vote.

The red/blue map of the country charting the vote is here:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/vote2000/electfront.htm

Currently, Bush is ahead of Gore by about 4 electoral votes. With this election so close, everyone on all sides need to know *unequivocally* who really won. Dont you think so?

In terms of your claim that the *population today* wants Gore to concede, it is questionable. When a news source states
this as:

"As of this writing, 92.2 percent said to give it up. Only 7.4 percent wanted [Gore] to keep crying for more recounts."

You have to wonder if NewsMax.com is slanted towards Bush and is a reliable news source in general. Especially since they are accusing Gore of voter fraud and "stealing the election". I would be interested to
know how the poll was executed (i.e. was it an online poll). 92% does not really mean much when only 1000 or even 10,000 people participate.

I will check into "Unlimited Access" to see what the Clinton + Gore administration is *REALLY* like. My feeling is that it
is just dirt.

Im checking into the reason as to why the Florida Democratic Party filed the motion. This is what I found so far:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/vote2000/beach.htm

It suggests that FDP was objecting mainly because of the affiliation of Judicial Watch and the high possibility of compromise with the ballets. I think it's interesting how Harris immediately jumps to certify Bush based solely on the machine recount when the recount ordered called for it to be done manually.

-Howdy
 
She probably jumped to certify the ballots because the more a punch card style ballot is handled, the weaker the perforations around the chads get and the more likely they are to fall out, which explains why there were loose chads of the floor. There were even pictures in the news of a police officer holding 10 chads he found on the floor in his hand. Where did these chads come from? From people handling the ballots thats where. Even with machine counts, the more you run em through the weaker they get. When the news shows pictures of people holding them in the air and waving them around a bit, this seems like they are trying to get the chads to fall out. My feeling is, if you voted correctly your vote should count, but if you didn't punch out the chad, punched too many chads, or didn't check to make sure you voted correctly, it's your own fault. As for the dimpled chads, three different counties',with punchcard ballots, Supervisors of Election Canvasing Boards agreed that since the chads require very little pressure to punch them out, it is nearly impossible for someone to attempt to punch a hole and only dimple it. The government should NOT have the ability to determine what a voter is thinking. If the vote is not done correctly, it should not count. After all, you can't just put a pencil point dot in a bubble on a scantron test and expect it to be correct.
 
This is my last post concerning this topic. At this point, I couldn't give a sh** who wins. They're both double-speaking politicians. But I think it would be a fun 4 years to see Bush bumbling around in the whitehouse, trying to act Presidential
smile.gif


~Howdy

 
Okay, then I'll join up with you and agree that this will be my last post concerning this. I too want this to be over and I would rather watch Bush bumbling around in the whitehouse than Gore trying to sell it to the highest bidder. I'd like to see everyone let this topic die.

Mark
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top