Thoughts on chopping with the BK4 and the BK9 (A lot of Pics)

Joined
Aug 3, 2007
Messages
400
Spent some time last week with the 9 and the 4, and with all the discussion on which is a "better" chopper I thought I'd offer some thoughts.

P1010483.JPG


P1010484.JPG


P1010485.JPG


The 9 digs deeper and definitely hits with a bigger thunk.

Chopped on some red oak that's been down about six weeks.

P1010439.JPG


P1010444.JPG


I like big chunks as opposed to a lot of chips.

P1010445.JPG


If you can roll the log it's a piece of cake.

P1010448.JPG


P1010449.JPG


P1010451.JPG


Machax doesn't cut as deep, but it doesn't have any tendency to stick. It may glance though. The 9 likes to stick because it digs so deep.

P1010452.JPG


P1010454.JPG


The 4 is much more precise since you chop with the forward part of the blade. Notice how I notched in the edges. If you tried to do that with the 9 you'd be chopping with the tip and hitting dirt and rock, as you can't always roll the log.

P1010456.JPG


P1010460.JPG


Here's why.

P1010463.JPG


P1010462.JPG


9 on some green Red Maple.

P1010464.JPG


P1010465.JPG


Pretty much done unless I want to risk mucking up my edge.

P1010466.JPG


Same notch after some finesse with the 4.

P1010467.JPG


Not always can you limb from the bottom to the top.

P1010474.JPG


No notch required for the 4.

P1010476.JPG


I believe the forward chopping of the 4 leaves somewhat less risk of barking the knuckles.

P1010477.JPG


P1010478.JPG


P1010480.JPG


P1010481.JPG


Even used the 4 to drive a felling wedge.

P1010489.JPG


I'll keep the estwing around for that though.

P1010492.JPG


Two very fine blades.

P1010495.JPG


So I don't think either is "better," they're just different. Want something like a felling axe... swing hard, make chips fly, dig deep with little risk of glancing? That'd be the 9.

Like a little finesse? Chopping logs on the ground, in awkward positions, some limbing? That'd be the 4.

Plus, to me, the 4 is just.... art...

P1010482.JPG


P1010498.JPG
 
very interesting thoughts Mark. I especially like the pic with the axe comparison. Kinda my view too, King= Raw Power, 'Chax= Finesse
 
Good writeup, pix and thoughts. I love my 9, but I think a 4 may be in order soon. Can't have too many Beckers, and they can serve different purposes.
 
Thanks for the insights and great pics. I got a 9 and was a bit skeptical on what the 4 would add but it's posts like this that convinced me to get one anyway.
 
I like both for different reasons but I think i'll stick with the 9 mainly because I cannot for the life of me get my machax sharp.
 
I recenctly did a head to head chopping comparison that included a 9 and a 4 plus a few others, didn't really give much thought to the finess of the 4. I havn't posted pics yet, blah,blah,blah huh? thank for the insight as to more than just chopping ability, i will pay more attention to that upon next use of the 4:)
 
I like both for different reasons but I think i'll stick with the 9 mainly because I cannot for the life of me get my machax sharp.

Keep at it! sharpening a recurve is different. it took me a while to get the hang of sharpening mine, too. Finally got the edge the way i want it. shaves. Might want to try narrow stones and a sharpie, that's how I got there. After I convexed it :D.

Ax, This is a great contrast-ison. I just gained some insight about the BK-4, and the BK-9 and which is a little better at what. One thing I picked up is that the grind heights probably provide an explanation of the Bk-9's deeper bite.

Please forgive me, I'm about to get technical :D
7339877578_75f2bed858_b.jpg

a little bit of a skewed angle. But, hopefully, the pic came out ok enough to see... I'm no pro photographer. But the moral of the story is that the Bk-4 has a grind height of around 7/8" (0.890" right at the thickest point) while the Bk-9 has a grind height of around 1 3/16" (1.175"). These are both Kabar knives. Taking stock thickness into account, the Bk-4 is 0.195" thick Bk-9 is 0.188" on the money (per the blade database's stats). Only 7 thousandths different. That is a quite similar stock thickness, and a good bit shorter grind for the Bk-4, providing a wider(more acute) grind angle. explaining why the BK-9 tends to bite deeper.

That being said, I would expect the BK-4 to split(baton) better because of the wider angle and greater focus of energy at the sweet spot. I also found it neat the the BK-4 seemed to limb better, but I'm going to chalk that up to the same focus of energy as above, and spare everyone a second pseudo-science lecture :D

I've been "playing around" with the two pictured for a few weeks, and I can say that, without a doubt that I find them both to be excellent at just about everything around the yard. They both destroy at yardwork, lol.
 
Last edited:
Keep at it! sharpening a recurve is different. it took me a while to get the hang of sharpening mine, too. Finally got the edge the way i want it. shaves. Might want to try narrow stones and a sharpie, that's how I got there. After I convexed it :D.

What stones do you use?
 
Well...just under 6 minutes of chopping with a BK-9, not sure I am ready to try it with a 4 just yet :)

IMG_2783.jpg
 
What stones do you use?

Used one of the repurposed cylinder hones that Murph brought to the gathering (thanks!), my India was just too wide to do it easily, but I suppose the side of a single grit stone would work fine. Or one of those ceramic rods. The trick is to cut into the stone while keeping the bevel angle consistent, and the stone 90 degrees to the edge where being sharpened. With the machax, this means changing the angle you're holding the 'chax at a lot. Good luck!
 
Excellent review and pics. Enjoyed reading your take on the differences too. I'm a fan of straight blades, but I'm sure the 4 could get you around quite nicely after a little learning curve.
Great post.
 
Great job, brother.

Very well done.

Moose
 
Keep at it! sharpening a recurve is different. it took me a while to get the hang of sharpening mine, too. Finally got the edge the way i want it. shaves. Might want to try narrow stones and a sharpie, that's how I got there. After I convexed it :D.

Ax, This is a great contrast-ison. I just gained some insight about the BK-4, and the BK-9 and which is a little better at what. One thing I picked up is that the grind heights probably provide an explanation of the Bk-9's deeper bite.

Please forgive me, I'm about to get technical :D
7339877578_75f2bed858_b.jpg

a little bit of a skewed angle. But, hopefully, the pic came out ok enough to see... I'm no pro photographer. But the moral of the story is that the Bk-4 has a grind height of around 7/8" (0.890" right at the thickest point) while the Bk-9 has a grind height of around 1 3/16" (1.175"). These are both Kabar knives. Taking stock thickness into account, the Bk-4 is 0.195" thick Bk-9 is 0.188" on the money (per the blade database's stats). Only 7 thousandths different. That is a quite similar stock thickness, and a good bit shorter grind for the Bk-4, providing a wider(more acute) grind angle. explaining why the BK-9 tends to bite deeper.

That being said, I would expect the BK-4 to split(baton) better because of the wider angle and greater focus of energy at the sweet spot. I also found it neat the the BK-4 seemed to limb better, but I'm going to chalk that up to the same focus of energy as above, and spare everyone a second pseudo-science lecture :D

I've been "playing around" with the two pictured for a few weeks, and I can say that, without a doubt that I find them both to be excellent at just about everything around the yard. They both destroy at yardwork, lol.

you need an American ruler...... :D
but you make a good point, I think the angle of grind DOES explain some of why the 9 bites deeper.


I actually prefer to baton with the 9, the curved 4 is more awkward for me....the straight blade wins in that category, IMO anyways.
 
Great post. Great pics. Not that it matters, but I agreed with everything you said. My exact feeling on both. You can't go wrong with either tool.

As for sharpening the BK4?,,,I am a big fan of a diamond steel rod. This way, the knife stays in place, and the steel is doing the work. I finish with a ceramic rod, and then a strop. I am no sharpening expert, but all my knives shave hair...so they are sharp enough for me.
 
I like these comparison threads! Really puts things in better in a perspective and makes me even more confused about which Becker to get! Now I think I fully understand about the default responses; "Get both" or "Get them all" :D :thumbup:
 
Back
Top