Spent some time last week with the 9 and the 4, and with all the discussion on which is a "better" chopper I thought I'd offer some thoughts.
The 9 digs deeper and definitely hits with a bigger thunk.
Chopped on some red oak that's been down about six weeks.
I like big chunks as opposed to a lot of chips.
If you can roll the log it's a piece of cake.
Machax doesn't cut as deep, but it doesn't have any tendency to stick. It may glance though. The 9 likes to stick because it digs so deep.
The 4 is much more precise since you chop with the forward part of the blade. Notice how I notched in the edges. If you tried to do that with the 9 you'd be chopping with the tip and hitting dirt and rock, as you can't always roll the log.
Here's why.
9 on some green Red Maple.
Pretty much done unless I want to risk mucking up my edge.
Same notch after some finesse with the 4.
Not always can you limb from the bottom to the top.
No notch required for the 4.
I believe the forward chopping of the 4 leaves somewhat less risk of barking the knuckles.
Even used the 4 to drive a felling wedge.
I'll keep the estwing around for that though.
Two very fine blades.
So I don't think either is "better," they're just different. Want something like a felling axe... swing hard, make chips fly, dig deep with little risk of glancing? That'd be the 9.
Like a little finesse? Chopping logs on the ground, in awkward positions, some limbing? That'd be the 4.
Plus, to me, the 4 is just.... art...
The 9 digs deeper and definitely hits with a bigger thunk.
Chopped on some red oak that's been down about six weeks.
I like big chunks as opposed to a lot of chips.
If you can roll the log it's a piece of cake.
Machax doesn't cut as deep, but it doesn't have any tendency to stick. It may glance though. The 9 likes to stick because it digs so deep.
The 4 is much more precise since you chop with the forward part of the blade. Notice how I notched in the edges. If you tried to do that with the 9 you'd be chopping with the tip and hitting dirt and rock, as you can't always roll the log.
Here's why.
9 on some green Red Maple.
Pretty much done unless I want to risk mucking up my edge.
Same notch after some finesse with the 4.
Not always can you limb from the bottom to the top.
No notch required for the 4.
I believe the forward chopping of the 4 leaves somewhat less risk of barking the knuckles.
Even used the 4 to drive a felling wedge.
I'll keep the estwing around for that though.
Two very fine blades.
So I don't think either is "better," they're just different. Want something like a felling axe... swing hard, make chips fly, dig deep with little risk of glancing? That'd be the 9.
Like a little finesse? Chopping logs on the ground, in awkward positions, some limbing? That'd be the 4.
Plus, to me, the 4 is just.... art...