Sergiusz Mitin wrote:
Not all opinions should be positive only, right?
I agree.
I think that I didn´t relay my thoughts in a clear manor. Let me try to explain.
"Made in USA" - some people think that this supports business in USA. That could be right or wrong depending on what economical philosophy you base your reasoning on (not talking Communism vs Capitalism but rather different forms of capitalism). For some it might be a stamp of quality. For some. Not all and certainly not for me. I look for quality/dollar. So the "Made in USA" remark wasn´t supposed to be meant as a positive remark but more as an explanation to why a product might cost more. I don´t mean that "Made in USA" is worse either, only more expensive in most cases (labor cost).
You mention Benchmade which are nice knives. I don´t know if they are "made" or assembled in USA. The same about Spydercos models like the Gunting. Are they really "Made in USA" or "Assembled in USA"? Anyone care to bring some light here (with first hand knowledge and not assumptions)?
Example:
The Gunting is one model that might be (don´t know the head of marketing at Spyderco or what he/she really thinks) aimed towards the "Pro 2:nd amendment/Pro self preservation" part of the population in USA. Probably one of the more "Made in USA" conscious markets. They might (assumption again) get less profit in the beginnig but if the "Self defense knife" becomes big $$$ market it´s nice to have a big market share from the beginning. A lot of assumptions in this paragraph... The main question is still if Benchmade and/or Spyderco makes a difference between "made" and "assembled".
Microtech are made in the USA according to their site (if my memory serves me right). The ones I have owned and tried has been very good quality. I won´t argue with that. I do not like metal handles in cold weather though, a minor point for some people. A major point for me not to buy that kind of knife as a user.
Sergiusz Mitin wrote:
Maybe these companies save hyping costs investing into quality?
Or some companies are better at lowering their operational costs (Operational Efficency)? Who knows. We would have to see figures and calculations that aren´t public.
My main point is that production companies rarely sees to the individual consumer but rather to a whole market or a part of a market. That´s probably the main reason why I have started to buy custom knives. You get exactly what you want if you are ready to pay for it.
I think that the ´98 Commander is closer to a custom than to a production knife - if I look to my preferences and compare quality (even to Benchmade and Spyderco). I like the thick liners and the thick scales. The blade is perfect for me. I don´t care if it´s V- or chisel grind. The handle is also perfect for my hand. Love the wave. I´ve never cut so fast with a folder from closed to open position. If you need a more reliable cutting tool - go fixed blade. But when you are in a situation where you can´t "flaunt it" IMO a folder is the way to got and there are only two methods that I like: the wave and the ramp (on my Gunting).
I tried it on a pair of freehanging Docker pants. Cut the leg almost in two (about 45 degree angle). Almost the same result with my Gunting on the other leg. The shorter blade on the G might have led to the lesser (shorter) cut on the leg. I haven´t had the opportunity to try leather or Cordura, yet.
I can however agree with one critique - the liners. I like the thicker ones on the ´98 Commander, why else would I get one from that year?
Not trying to start a flame war or stepping on anyones toes. Just trying to explain my thougts a little better and why I like the Commander.
/Colinz