- Joined
- Jul 14, 2000
- Messages
- 1,537
Originally posted by John Jay:
I have wrestled with this same question and have come to a couple conclusions.To avoid splitting hairs, any combination of implements can be considered a multi-tool regardless of what those implements are. I consider the "traditional multi-tool" to include pliers (blunt or needlenose).
Many SAKs can be considered multi-tools,but we call them SAKs.Of course,the Swiss Tool is a "traditional multi-tool".
Unless someone has a better classification system,I would still refer to a multi-tool which has scissors (instead of pliers) as a multi-tool.The scissors may be more important to one user and another may vote for pliers.
I happen to agree with you though,in a pinch I can get around scissors one way or another.If I need pliers or wire cutters,the scissors don't help at all
You no longer have an actual workingman's tool if the pliers are replaced with small scissors,which might be convenient for certain tasks,but aren't an invaluable tool as pliers can be.
I have wrestled with this same question and have come to a couple conclusions.To avoid splitting hairs, any combination of implements can be considered a multi-tool regardless of what those implements are. I consider the "traditional multi-tool" to include pliers (blunt or needlenose).
Many SAKs can be considered multi-tools,but we call them SAKs.Of course,the Swiss Tool is a "traditional multi-tool".
Unless someone has a better classification system,I would still refer to a multi-tool which has scissors (instead of pliers) as a multi-tool.The scissors may be more important to one user and another may vote for pliers.
I happen to agree with you though,in a pinch I can get around scissors one way or another.If I need pliers or wire cutters,the scissors don't help at all
