I have 4 flippers now. I have a Zero Tolerance ZT0566BW, a Kershaw Cryo II, a CH CH3001, and a Harnds Talisman.
The ZT0566BW does not have thumb studs in reality, but they are the blade stop for open. Well they can be used as thumb studs if you want when the knife is de-assisted. When the knife is open they are basically out of the way of the cutting path. Being that they are an integral part of the design to hold the knife open I can understand their implementation.
The Cryo II has a flipper, assisted opening, and thumb studs. Why? What possible real reason is there for these thumb studs? If they are there for more sheeple friendly opening action, the assisted opening still takes over and it flies open almost as suddenly and with as much noise as the flipper. They are also in the cutting path. If you de-assist the Cryo II, if possible, you still could open the knife with two hands to not scare the public, and the thumb studs are still in the way of the cutting path. BTW, my Cryo II is a total POS.
Quickly becoming one of my favorite knives, the CH3001 is a flipper with no studs. This makes perfect sense. For one it makes it easier to get in and out of the pocket as you don't have the studs grabbing at the fabric. The full cutting edge is unobstructed by studs. If I need to open my knife in a more friendly way for idiots, I can still open it two handed.
My Harnds Talisman has all the same attributes as the CH3001, as far as the thumb stud comments go.
So, WTF? Why do designers and manufacturers still put thumb studs on flippers? It seems to provided no real benefit. If it is to provide sheeple friendly one hand opening, I think sheeple will be afraid of one hand opening regardless of the method. Thumb studs usually get in the way of the cutting path and add cost to production. As far as I can see they are only a detriment. Why are they there?
What am I missing?
The ZT0566BW does not have thumb studs in reality, but they are the blade stop for open. Well they can be used as thumb studs if you want when the knife is de-assisted. When the knife is open they are basically out of the way of the cutting path. Being that they are an integral part of the design to hold the knife open I can understand their implementation.
The Cryo II has a flipper, assisted opening, and thumb studs. Why? What possible real reason is there for these thumb studs? If they are there for more sheeple friendly opening action, the assisted opening still takes over and it flies open almost as suddenly and with as much noise as the flipper. They are also in the cutting path. If you de-assist the Cryo II, if possible, you still could open the knife with two hands to not scare the public, and the thumb studs are still in the way of the cutting path. BTW, my Cryo II is a total POS.
Quickly becoming one of my favorite knives, the CH3001 is a flipper with no studs. This makes perfect sense. For one it makes it easier to get in and out of the pocket as you don't have the studs grabbing at the fabric. The full cutting edge is unobstructed by studs. If I need to open my knife in a more friendly way for idiots, I can still open it two handed.
My Harnds Talisman has all the same attributes as the CH3001, as far as the thumb stud comments go.
So, WTF? Why do designers and manufacturers still put thumb studs on flippers? It seems to provided no real benefit. If it is to provide sheeple friendly one hand opening, I think sheeple will be afraid of one hand opening regardless of the method. Thumb studs usually get in the way of the cutting path and add cost to production. As far as I can see they are only a detriment. Why are they there?
What am I missing?