HEMI 49
Gold Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2018
- Messages
- 1,117
Beautiful knives, I love the character on those. Thank you for sharing.
Thank you....... The have a wonderful, solid feel..... I wish I had discovered them long ago.....
Beautiful knives, I love the character on those. Thank you for sharing.
Those are exceptional!
I feel the same way about the Schatt & Morgan’s I recently picked up. Quality!Thank you....... The have a wonderful, solid feel..... I wish I had discovered them long ago.....
I feel the same way about the Schatt & Morgan’s I recently picked up. Quality!
Left column are 3 S&M Railsplitters and 2 S&M Swaybelly Trappers... Right hand column is a hodge podge of misc S&M ..... I think they all date prior to 2011 with most being circa 2005-2007.....
I'm not real warm to the reverse worm groove handles on the long knife in R.H. column.... They look kinda chintzy to my eyes.....
All the others I really like..... I think S&M did a fine job of design and manufacturing the knives I've acquired so far......View attachment 1437449
My Schatt & Morgan’s (GEC 97 for scale)...
Just the File & Wire Tested...
My Schatt & Morgan’s (GEC 97 for scale)...
Just the File & Wire Tested...
I kind of like worm groove, but I agree with you - the reverse worm groove is not one of my favorites.I'm not real warm to the reverse worm groove handles on the long knife in R.H. column.... They look kinda chintzy to my eyes.....
View attachment 1437449
My Schatt & Morgan’s (GEC 97 for scale)...
Just the File & Wire Tested...
Honestly, it just came this morning so I haven’t had any real use with it yet. My initial impressions: the handle is longer and fuller so it has a little more heft than the 97. It is solidly made. Though my 97 might have a little more precision in its manufacturing, this 9 year old blade is close. Also, it’s damn pretty. I like the worm grooved bone. This knife has a presence, it’s imposing and looks quite striking.How do you like that S&M Coke Bottle? It looks like it falls within the more traditional sizing - I've been thinking about picking up some of those myself.
Honestly, it just came this morning so I haven’t had any real use with it yet. My initial impressions: the handle is longer and fuller so it has a little more heft than the 97. It is solidly made. Though my 97 might have a little more precision in its manufacturing, this 9 year old blade is close. Also, it’s damn pretty. I like the worm grooved bone. This knife has a presence, it’s imposing and looks quite striking.
It was listed on the Bay as a #6 tear drop.Very nice! What is the model name of that wharncliffe? I like that big chunky sheepsfoot too.
Yes, you are correct.Awesome, thank you for the info. I seem to recall reading about that one having ATS-34 steel as well? If so, should make for a nice, robust knife all around.
I really like that single blade with the worm groove handle covers. What model is that one?
I really like that single blade with the worm groove handle covers. What model is that one?
I would like to see the use of a razor blade steel, something like 13c26, 12c27, AEB-L. These should give excellent results for a pocket knife, without being as hard on the tooling as higher carbide stainless steels like 440C, ATS34, etc.
Forgive me as I'm not intimately familiar with the S&M history but were they predominantly 1095?
The number of folks I've seen here on the Porch rail against stainless and how inferior it is and how "non traditional" it is, combined with GEC's overwhelming use of 1095 makes me wonder why Mr. Cooper would not use it. Super simple steel to process and apparently the "real" traditional people crave it. Why buy decades old equipment and then change the steel? Especially when GEC says it is too hard on their equipment. An assertion I still don't understand. I get tool and die wear if that is what they mean. Not questioning it, just saying I don't understand what that means.
I have no idea what Mr. Cooper's vision is or his execution plan, but if he's buying up all that stuff, then it suggests to me, that in terms of manufacturing, he's trying to replicate whatever S&M was at it's peak. Old equipment or not, that had to be a sizable investment. If he wanted to inject something truly new into the market, why not start small and buy newer stuff?
I know this will ruffle many feathers, but I think the entire GEC thing is 80% marketing and 20% quality. Sure, if the quality wasn't there, and I fully acknowledge it is, then the rest couldn't happen, but he's created the market. It isn't unlike Spyderco sprint or exclusive runs only that's all GEC really does.
Why would Mr. Cooper try to compete with that? Why not pick a few patterns in the ole tried-and-true carbon steel, execute them well at reasonable prices and see how the market reacts? Get your sea legs, pay off the investments, and see where the tides take you.
Just my rambling thoughts...