Hi all ... looks like I spoke a little early the other day - I received a reply from Benchmade this afternoon. Here it is:
"Sorry it's taken me so long to reply to your questions, I've been extremely busy as of late.
First let me clear up an apparent misunderstanding. It sounds to me like you're familiar with the investment casting process and your correct in stating that there shouldn't be any wax left when the metal is poured. The porosity in question is not caused by wax left in the mold.
The porosity mainly occurs from the pour itself. This is done in a vacuum chamber but the molten titanium is still poured into the mold which allows for "pockets" to form as the liquid metal fills the mold. These pockets occur in all investment cast parts (although much depends on part shape and complexity). The common solutions for such internal porosity is a centrifugal pour, where the actual mold is being "spun" during the pour, and a processes called HIPPING. This process heats up the casting to a determined temperature then applies a certain amount of pressure thus forcing all of the "solids" together and the "porosity" to the exterior of the part. This process works great but leaves all of the external porosity on the surfaces which then needs to be worked out. Both of these processes
are costly.
All Pacific Cutlery/Benchmade production bali-songs produced in the last 20 or so years were manufactured using investment casting. We have never had a structural failure returned from a customer (that I'm aware of). Although the titanium is a relatively new material for our bali-songs (we've been manufacturing these for about 20 months now) we have not had any structural failures due to porosity.
In regard to what testing we do, first we rely on our vendor for their
expertise. The same processes and standards are employed on our bali-song handles as are used for most of the investment cast titanium golf clubs, framing hammers and firearm parts that currently manufactured. For example, Ruger Firearms uses the same investment casting processes. Check out this site...
http://www.rugerinvcast.com/.
In addition to vendor QA we also do our own destructive and functional
testing (I get the joy of personally working all new bali's as long and as hard as possible with the sole intent of destruction). Each knife gets put through a side load stress test during the adjustment step. This is to ensure integrity if a "prying" type of stress is put on the knife. We also will use a 2 ton arbor press to put the same type of stress on the handles that occur when you squeeze the handles together. This puts far more pressure on the handles/pivots than will ever be put on by hand.
Basically, it's a cosmetic problem and not structural.
So, what are we doing about this now and what are we going to do to
eliminate this problem in the future? We have a great vendor whom we're working closely with to eliminate this problem as well as an intensive focus in our own facility. For the future, we currently have some exiting things in the works (that is why I've been so busy!) that will totally blow your socks off. All I can say is please be patient with us. I promise you, you won't be disappointed.
At Benchmade we constantly want to innovate and evolve. The 42 was the first titanium investment casting in our industry, stainless steel
investment casting was old news. Titanium's a whole other beast. We're learning and growing and we appreciate customers like you who hold us accountable and drive us to perfection! Without customers like you we'd be any old knife company. Please continue to be the kind of customer that holds us to a higher standard.
I hope I've helped. Please feel free to e-mail me at any time:
vance@benchmade.com"
There's still some other things that I think I'll email Vance about, but it seems to me that BM are very willing to accept and respond to concerns from their consumers. I like that.
