Many times I've wondered the exact same thing about the production "Customs", concerning all the companies that offer them - Emerson, Strider, MT, ect. All of those grinds can be achieved by the machine they use for the productions. The main reason I believe this, is the fact that they are too perfect. I've owned and handled extremely high end customs by a lot of the top tier makers - Rj Martin, Southard, Rexford, Rassenti, Terzuola, Mayo - among many others. I can tell they are hand ground because I can always find a slight variance of the grind from side to side, albeit very miniscule. With the custom productions I've handled, I don't see that.
I've considered dedicating a thread to gauge others opinions, but I'm afraid it'd get out of hand rather quickly.
I would still call "customs" by Emerson, Strider and Microtech custom knives. There are degrees of course.
Emerson grinds the blades of his custom knives and forms & finishes the components himself. Then there are the production prototypes with a handground blade and production handles & liners.
More nebulous with Strider, but for example if it's got a handground damascus blade that Strider made himself, and frames that he sculpted & flamed, I think it's fair to call that custom. Like Emerson, other knives have handground blades & CNC shaped frames, and yet others have all machine ground parts.
Most Microtech customs use CNC produced handles & a handground blade. Some of the newer ones are all machine produced - I think that that goes a little too far and I would hesitate to call that custom.
Where did you get the impression that Emerson, Strider and MT have machine ground blades and that hand grinding produces a greater variance in grind?
The most even grinds I've had on a hand-ground blade was on a Terzuola. My Marfione customs & Emerson customs didn't have grinds as even. I honestly doubt that they use machine ground blades on their customs.
PURPLEDC said:
I would argue a custom knife using production components would make it a production knife. I dont even think many of the lower priced "customs" from mt are actually handground. And really? sure an ultratech or a LUDT may have spare parts available to fix them if they break, a knife like the anax lacks those parts that usually break so the chances of actually having a problem are a lot slimmer. I just dont see an advantage to having an auto that has parts that eventually will fail simply because those parts are readily available. I would argue a knife that the anax design being a lot less involved would have much less chances of breaking in the first place so wouldnt that carry the advantage? And there have been instances where older micros in fact cannot be repaired. Anyone with a chameleon D/A with the defective sear issue can attest to that.
Greg told me that the CMTX-5s were the ones with the sear issues, not the Chameleons.
I've had an Ultratech, a Mini UDT and an L-UDT have springs replaced by dealers who had them back to me within a week with no service fee. When the button failed on my Halo III I had a new button machined for it for a small sum, and the knife was back in my hands within a week as well.
With autos like those, a spring replacement is usually all you need.
When you have to deal with liners, framelocks and such it's more complicated than that. Your CMTX5 example is a good one. 10 years from now the liner on your custom CMTX5 has worn to the other liner and you have lock rock & play. You think Microtech will be able to give you a new liner or a new knife? You think they can do it for free?
Even some production knives using liners & framelocks might as well be one-off customs as far as the lock is concerned as each blade is fitted individually to each lock. ,
Many times with autos you don't even have to use springs that were intended or manufactured for the knife they're going into.
Like I said I prefer the completely handmade knives, but there's something to be said for customs that utilize production components. I love Bob Lum's and Phil Boguszewski's knives but one thing that is keeping me from getting one is the fact that if I were to ever have a problem with them I would be totally out of luck. I'd have to go to a knifemaker for repairs & replacement components - and the new components wouldn't be identical to the originals anyhow, destroying the appearance, collectibility and value of the knife.