- Joined
- Nov 3, 2004
- Messages
- 8
Hi guys; 'tis my first post. Seems like a nice place. I have a question.
Recent events - the details are unimportant here - have made me revisit my decision to avoid carrying a knife. Previously I didn't think it necessary, but now I'm starting to wonder. I live in New Zealand, which - as most countries now in the West, it seems - is becoming increasingly PC and averse to even acknowledging that the potential for violence in everyday life exists. Maximum carry length for a knife is - I believe - 3.25". Of course this isn't really a problem; the Spyderco Para-Military or something similar would fill that role nicely. But I guess I'm wondering as to the wisdom of it.
I train in Zen Do Kai, which is essentially a freestyle martial art. Not sure if anyone much outside of Australasia would have heard of it. I've been studying there for about three and a half years and have just reached my probationary first degree black belt. I've done some training with weapons and with reacting to them, but not a whole lot; it's something I plan to look into in far greater detail over the coming months.
On the one hand, it seems to me that ultimately it's better to have a knife on you than not; of course you can always choose when to deploy it.
On the other hand - especially if you're carrying a folder - there is going to be precious time taken in getting it out. Not something I think you'd want to try in the middle of a fight. But this essentially means that you have to make the decision to draw [or not] at the beginning, and if you do draw, it seems pretty much assured that someone's going to die.
I guess I'm wondering what everyones' views are on this. What do you all think the chances are of a knife acting as a catalyst to greater violence than would otherwise have been necessary? And do you think that this is outweighed by the simple fact that you do have a knife on you should things come to a head in some dark parking lot?
A quick clarification: I'm not a fan of violence. Certainly I never think it is necessary until one party or other decides to make it so; unfortunately, a lot of people seem to do exactly that. And if it comes down to a choice between my walking away and theirs, I don't plan on laying down. I've had a quick browse of the boards and most of you seem well-aware of the aversion to violence that is beginning to seep heavily into western thought; I just want to make it clear that my post does not have this behind it. But nor am I a fan of unnecessary pain on the part of anyone.
Blar. Sorry for the ramble. And my apologies if this topic has been done to death before, but I had a quick read through and I couldn't see any signs of it.
Cheers,
Michael.
Recent events - the details are unimportant here - have made me revisit my decision to avoid carrying a knife. Previously I didn't think it necessary, but now I'm starting to wonder. I live in New Zealand, which - as most countries now in the West, it seems - is becoming increasingly PC and averse to even acknowledging that the potential for violence in everyday life exists. Maximum carry length for a knife is - I believe - 3.25". Of course this isn't really a problem; the Spyderco Para-Military or something similar would fill that role nicely. But I guess I'm wondering as to the wisdom of it.
I train in Zen Do Kai, which is essentially a freestyle martial art. Not sure if anyone much outside of Australasia would have heard of it. I've been studying there for about three and a half years and have just reached my probationary first degree black belt. I've done some training with weapons and with reacting to them, but not a whole lot; it's something I plan to look into in far greater detail over the coming months.
On the one hand, it seems to me that ultimately it's better to have a knife on you than not; of course you can always choose when to deploy it.
On the other hand - especially if you're carrying a folder - there is going to be precious time taken in getting it out. Not something I think you'd want to try in the middle of a fight. But this essentially means that you have to make the decision to draw [or not] at the beginning, and if you do draw, it seems pretty much assured that someone's going to die.
I guess I'm wondering what everyones' views are on this. What do you all think the chances are of a knife acting as a catalyst to greater violence than would otherwise have been necessary? And do you think that this is outweighed by the simple fact that you do have a knife on you should things come to a head in some dark parking lot?
A quick clarification: I'm not a fan of violence. Certainly I never think it is necessary until one party or other decides to make it so; unfortunately, a lot of people seem to do exactly that. And if it comes down to a choice between my walking away and theirs, I don't plan on laying down. I've had a quick browse of the boards and most of you seem well-aware of the aversion to violence that is beginning to seep heavily into western thought; I just want to make it clear that my post does not have this behind it. But nor am I a fan of unnecessary pain on the part of anyone.
Blar. Sorry for the ramble. And my apologies if this topic has been done to death before, but I had a quick read through and I couldn't see any signs of it.
Cheers,
Michael.