Ghost Kobun said:
One of my misguided remarks was the Sayoc intent & purpose. As you are all offended by this, yet you propell your views about the system & let's be precise, no one yet has proved to me that it is not.
Incorrect (surprised?).
People were not offended, but pointed out that you placed value judgements on a system you didn't train in.
Basically, your whole point is that one knife is moral and two or more is not. Which is rather silly since no matter how many knives one carries, it is only the knife that have inflicted damage in the bad guy's body that has anything to do with the actual scenario.
You even stated you carried three chef knives for work.
That doesn't mean you are using all three knives simultaneously.
From your initial post:
Ghost Kobun said:
I carry one blade, I find that moraly,it is enough to protect myself.
Yet, you contradict that statement with this:
Ghost Kobun said:
I meant the remark as a compliment, since many of the Bushi has been watered down to the point of being non effective. Yours is very effective, yet you do not take this as a compliment, what does it take?
It takes being truthful to what you're really trying to imply. That although Sayoc is for 'warfare' and 'efficient', your morality and methods are much BETTER for you and others such as the LEOs you claim to teach.
Basically, you started a thread, not to talk about how effective Sayoc is, but to use it so that you can beat your chest and puff up your ego.
People can see thru insincerity.
Again, you ended your initial post with this value judgement on Sayoc, that was NOT complimentary at all, was it?
Ghost Kobun said:
I would see the need to carry more in warfare--but fortunatly for me in live in a place where the need is non existant.
Need we go on and actually interpret your inappropriate post FOR you so that you are not so confused?
Ghost Kobun said:
Warefare means war, the streets are the battleground, the enemy, lurks at every corner. Therefore, Sayoc would be a great asset to be schooled in...
You just CONTRADICTED your initial post, but perhaps the blame lies with your "poor english or typo":
Ghost Kobun said:
I would see the need to carry more in warfare--but fortunatly for me in live in a place where the need is non existant.
Next you attempt to force team my comment below so that you can use it incorrectly to support your 'argument' (which of course you contradict again by saying all that I talk about is negativity):
Ghost Kobun said:
Do you now understand my reasoning for my remark: Sun Helmet said it best, that the knives used are designed to cause internal damage.
It doesn't assist your whole argument at all about MULTIPLE KNIVES. ONE knife used on a bad guy is still a knife. The amount of knives you carry doesn't mean you will use them simultaneously. It doesn't even apply to the way we train Sayoc Kali. However, you do not understand the methodology and thus make a false assumption about multiple knife carry.
Ghost Kobun said:
I find that many here are full of their own BS.
That's just because you're looking at several mirrors at once.
Ghost Kobun said:
The **** I have learn is for warfare, & I don't clinch in saying it.
Actually you do. Read your initial statement again:
Ghost Kobun said:
I would see the need to carry more in warfare--but fortunatly for me in live in a place where the need is non existant.
You follow this with more jumbled logic.
Ghost Kobun said:
Unfortunatly in this world made of lawyers & Judges, non lethal alternatives must also be learned. Unfortunatly, that origninal question was never answered, thus I will assume as I hade said: Sayoc can only be used in warfare.
Here's your original question:
Ghost Kobun said:
How many knives does one require to be safe?
For someone who carries spare knives for kitchen work, you can not follow the logic that people would carry spare knives for survival?
People were not answering it because it is self-evident.
You carry multiple knives for economy of motion, for back up, for multiple use (perhaps one is for work), as well as many other reasons anyone would carry spares for.
You also have a very limited view of what Sayoc teaches... not everything is lethal. We have methods for "friends and family members".
Ghost Kobun said:
As for the templates: Those strikes can be life threatning, perhaps not VITAL, but how vital does a strike to the neck have to be. Kobun
What do you think you will be doing with your ONE knife Kobun... as opposed to carrying two knives? Will ONE knife lessen the damage?
As per knowing the vital templates, at least you will know WHY you are doing something, instead of merely "striking the neck" - which has no useful information as far as what you're actually doing when you damage the:
1. Sternocleidomastoid Structure
2. Carotids - Internal/External
3. Jugulars
4. Spinal Accessory Nerve
5. Hypoglossal Nerve
6. Cervical plexus
7. Brachial Plexus
8. Omohyoid Superior Belly
for starters.
You will then teach students how these affect the human being you are personally inflicting damage on. What the body does, what to expect.
In fact, it is one of the MOST important MORAL lessons to teach a knife student. Why? Because they have a REAL understanding of what they are doing and will only act because their life depends on it.
They are no longer "striking the neck".. like some butcher cutting something that's already dead and murdered for them.
It makes the student THINK about their actions with the added bonus of an EDUCATED opinion.
Something that you might want to practice sometime.
--Rafael--
Sayoc Kali