Is it just me or does anyone else find the humor in a "Hotlink is theft" image posted about a knife that was created by another manufacturer several years ago but is being "imitated" by another? Ironic.
Moose
That's funny.
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
Is it just me or does anyone else find the humor in a "Hotlink is theft" image posted about a knife that was created by another manufacturer several years ago but is being "imitated" by another? Ironic.
Moose
3 points of difference make it a totally different knife:I can assure you there is no stealing of anything going on. TOPS and us are great friends. The Black Star sort of came from the Laser Strike. Different knife with the swedge though.
I can assure you there is no stealing of anything going on. TOPS and us are great friends. The Black Star sort of came from the Laser Strike. Different knife with the swedge though.
The only way to get a patent is have a patentable feature and then you have to apply for a patent within one year of inventing the patentable design.
My point being is there are a ton of misconceptions about a blade shape being protected and it not being "legal" for someone else to produce it without license or permission. Simply not true. Any company can knock off anything they want if they're that low class, and there's not much that can be done about it. For example, XYZ Knife company could start making the Junglas tomorrow and it be an EXACT knockoff and about the only then we could do about it is murder them on the internet (and we would) or send Moose to break the company owner's legs (and we would really consider that option too). Now, if they took the name "Junglas" then we would put lawyers on their ass because that IP is protected through the USPTO.
My point being is there are a ton of misconceptions about a blade shape being protected and it not being "legal" for someone else to produce it without license or permission. Simply not true. Any company can knock off anything they want if they're that low class, and there's not much that can be done about it. For example, XYZ Knife company could start making the Junglas tomorrow and it be an EXACT knockoff and about the only then we could do about it is murder them on the internet (and we would) or send Moose to break the company owner's legs (and we would really consider that option too). Now, if they took the name "Junglas" then we would put lawyers on their ass because that IP is protected through the USPTO.
3 points of difference make it a totally different knife:
sharpened spine
no spindle notch
spine of handle flush with the scales.
Does it actually have a double edge, or is that just a swedge?
The Black Star just has a swedge, I have one of those. Tough knife, like a tactical bushcraft knife, I really like it. I believe there is another version with an actually sharpened spine now too though.