Cliff Stamp
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 5, 1998
- Messages
- 17,562
You can't really judge the design fairly on that as TOPS runs way too thick grinds and their grips are problematic.stropper said:I only ever used the TOPS version though.
I have seen some awesome statements of performance on the customs, like they out chop Gransfors Bruks axes however the performance Rick described is more along what I would expect.
I agree in general this is a knife which sells heavily on its "speed hole" nature vs the actual performance as there is very little comparative data on how it performs compared to other knives of similar type.
The only real advantage I see is that when working on really large and thick woods which are wider than the chopping section in the front of the Tracker, it would have a contact area advantage over a simple spear point design as the Tracker would limit the contact length of the chop and thus gain relative penetration.
However this is only one aspect of performance, the upswept geometry as noted is a detraction to a lot of styles of chopping, plus you can also limit contact length with straight blades by changing the chopping angle and/or moving around the wood.
He is a custom maker in the true sense of the word, there are lots of options besides what is listed, I asked about plain carbon steels and that wasn't a problem, he was also willing to radically change the length and/or thickness.I would love to try one of these in o-1. (since other choices are D-2, ATS-34 and S30V[
If you use a partial grip and let the knife snap down well past the wrist, the edge can meet the wood with the same effective curvature as an axe. It could be that is the chopping style that Brown uses. I prefer the axe style profile personally.Thomas Linton said:Every good choping hand axe I have has an angle of attack opposite that presented by the Tracker and its progeny.
-Cliff