Tracking for 2x72?

A.McPherson

Knifemaker / Craftsman / Service Provider
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
2,934
Hey folks, I am in the process of building a 2x72,and I'd like some input on the tracking mechanism. I've seen 2 versions, one that is essentially a hinge that is adjusted vertically (like on the KMG clones) and the one that looks like a pivoting bar that adjusts horizontally (like the one on the esteem). Anyone have any idea which is better? It seems like the "esteem" style would be easier to make...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
In my experience, though it's dependent on the pitch of the domed tracking wheel, is that the vertical hinge offers finer adjustment than a horizontal pivot. If the horizontal pivot has a pivot point that's far removed from the axis of the wheel, increasing the radius it's being swung, it will become finer, but if you pivot it directly under the wheel, it's quite coarse in it's adjustment.

The first grinder I hacked together had a horizontal pivot, because like you say, it was easier to make (to a point, you also need a way to tension that pivot joint, which can increase the complexity of the mechanism), but the second one that I tried to "build right" has a vertical hinge.

The only problem I have with the vertical hinge, is that if you also control belt tension with the tracking wheel, and you do this through a pivoting arm and spring, you need to be careful that you don't allow the axis of the vertical hinge to get too far out of parallel with the general direction of the belt. IE too far out of the pivoting range and your vertical hinge becomes more like a horizontal pivot in orientation, and the adjustments become less effective. Too far and the belt won't hold it in position. It's easily resolved by moving your tool arm in or out depending on which way you need to go, but something to keep in mind.
 
I'm planning to build one too. Can you explain why you like the KMG style better please? Can't get enough info:p

I find it easier to control where I want the belt to be on my contact wheel or flat platen , maybe it is because the belt does not move as quickly as the other style . To my small brain it just seems correct to control the belt movement by moving the belt off of the dome of the tracking wheel as opposed to using the dome to point in a direction . Does this make sense ?
 
Hmmm interesting points guys. I'll have to look into getting some serious hinges if I'm going to do the KMG style. I worry that the hinge is a good place to introduce wobble and instability. There's a welding place in town that has "barrel" hinges that look pretty beefy. Any input on the hinge aspect?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Hmmm interesting points guys. I'll have to look into getting some serious hinges if I'm going to do the KMG style. I worry that the hinge is a good place to introduce wobble and instability. There's a welding place in town that has "barrel" hinges that look pretty beefy. Any input on the hinge aspect?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The typical hinge assembly is fashioned from a couple of pieces of 1/2" plate with a bolt for the hinge pin. You should be able to make one, or you can buy one:

Tracking Assembly
 
Back
Top