Traditionals vs Izula ii

Status
Not open for further replies.
2DEAD...I really like that H23. I've held a regular 73 and that was too small for my taste. I just got back from the mall and I took a look at the Buck 113. I'm wondering if that's a good buy in lieu of an internet order.
 
I can't comment on the Bucks as I don't have any but I don't remember hearing a bad thing about them. The H73 is slightly larger than the #73 in grip and only a bit more in blade thickness and length. The cutting length is about the same. The H73 is a larger knife though. I have it put away currently but its definitely thicker than the H73, don't remember if it was thicker than the ESEE-3 as well.

Here's a pic of a different H23 with a different H73. Hope this helps.
IMG_1956.jpg
 
I'll definitely look into the H23 and H73...if I go this route, I'll just add to my two GEC's that I currently own. Thanks for the pics!
 
The reason I put it here is because in General...I will get mostly praises for the knife. The reason it's here is because I own Traditionals and the Izula ii would take over the same role as these Traditionals. I wanted Traditional users to tell me what they think of the knife...I already know what the "survivalists" think of the knife.

Fair enough. I'll leave it be for the time being.

In general we try to keep the traditional forum for the discussion of traditional knives. I don't want this thread to set some precedent that will result in more of these types of discussions. They don't belong here.
 
Fair enough. I'll leave it be for the time being.

In general we try to keep the traditional forum for the discussion of traditional knives. I don't want this thread to set some precedent that will result in more of these types of discussions. They don't belong here.


Got it...wasn't my intention to have this go another way. Thanks
 
Hey Owen,

I never bothered with the Patch because I thought it was a lot smaller than the Izula ii...how's the comfort? It looks like it actually has more handle than the ESEE
 
I wish I'd have noticed this thread earlier today. I don't view the Izulas as traditional knives. Not that they aren't nice knives they just don't belong here. I'm hoping this thread kind of trails off so I don't have to close it.

Fair enough. I'll leave it be for the time being.

In general we try to keep the traditional forum for the discussion of traditional knives. I don't want this thread to set some precedent that will result in more of these types of discussions. They don't belong here.

OK. Now we are morphing into more comparisons. The thread has gone about as far as a thread about the the Izula is going to go in Traditional.
Closed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top