I've been thinking about this thread for the past week or so, and feeling like some things have gone unsaid which maybe should be said.
With regard to the videos I took, they weren't meant to show the overall capabilities of this knife. If that were the case, I would have filmed the knife being used for all kinds of things. Instead, I was recording my first test of this blade., and that happened to be on a section of trail which was overgrown with one specific plant.
In the same way that abrasive impregnated paper is used to test wear resistance, or pressure exerted through a diamond point is used to test hardness, I used the most difficult media to cut, (salal) to test the handling of this knife.
Yes, the overall weight is a factor, but more important to me in my testing is handling. My goal for this knife was to develop something with reach that hits with a solid impact, but feels balanced and neutral even for lighter duty cutting, like what I filmed. And also to test some principles behind the handle design, where a looser grip for cutting like this is possible while still being able to index the edge and aim it intuitively with every hit.
Salal is a springy, woody shrub which is also difficult to cut due to its irregular stem orientations and its tough, large leaves. Cutting it with a knife efficiently requires accuracy. It's not deciduous, it grows year round and is very gregarious. Also, it doesn't always look like it's being cut, when it is. That's because of the intertwining nature of its growth, where it will stay in place even after the stem is severed.
Now, it is possible that a knife could be designed specifically for this plant. I would suggest that this knife would look exactly like a lopping shear.
I did say, in the op, that I'd love to hear your thoughts.
N
Natlek
shared his thoughts, and in retrospect, I should have accepted them on their face, without sarcasm. That was my mistake. I would have been less inclined to be a dick about it if the statements were less absolutist and more of a question, but I did ask for feedback and should've been more gracious about it.
At any rate, although I wasn't offended by what was written, the tone rubbed me the wrong way- I felt like what I was trying to achieve here was obvious, but instead was misunderstood. That's on me. If I didn't want that kind of feedback, I shouldn't have asked for it.
In the future, with threads like this, I'm going to try and provide more background information from the outset.