Trolls

[Planterz]

I should add that bringing all that up again (your views, your subsequent labeling as a troll) in a thread that has nothing to do with that earlier discussion is also pure trolling. This thread has nothing to do with hunting or eating meat, yet you feel compelled for some reason to bring those views up and insult others that don't agree with you, and then act the pariah when called out on it. Pure trolling.

Or was it your intention to provide yourself as a 3rd example of a Troll to Dorrito Monk's list? Because you succeeded spectacularly in that regard.

 

[SpyderPhreak]

Sam Elliot and Tom Selleck have two of the best 'staches in history!!!

 

[sqoon]

A troll is anyone who likes Cold Steel.

See what I did there?

 

[stabman]

I would imagine you think that, because you strongly disagree with it, and doubtless consider my statement to be outrageous , over the top and very hostile.
Well it certainly is impolite and is very critical of the 'sport' of hunting, but I'm not sure why it should be considered a "textbook troll statement" unless you believe that most knive collectors are inextricably connected to hunting and therefore would be offended by my statement. [ and of course you could be right about that]

It was not so much the opinion expressed as the language choice which it "trolly".
You can express a dissenting opinion without including insults to the target audience.

Something like "I disagree that one must support hunting just because they appreciate knives" would be a valid opinion, and one which does not set up for an antagonistic response.