Types of steel

This has been thrashed about many times, and has occasionally become a big argument. If you want to see the past pleasant discussions ( and I use that word lightheartedly), search the topic.

My answer is this:
It is as likely to say that one particular type of second use steel is going to make a good knife as it is to say that a certain type of girl/woman is going to make a good wife. They both can be not what they appear to be. ( Thankfully, I have been lucky...twice).

In years past, steel was simpler and alloys were much more unified. Steel in the USA was made in the USA. The difference between one truck spring and the next was most likely very little. Today the spring could be made anywhere in the world ...and from as many as twenty alloys. Lists on the internet, even those posted by great people like Egnath, are not accurate or reliable anymore.

If you have a large and dependable source of a steel, get a sample tested, and go from there. If it is a piece or two, and you are an inexperienced maker, either set it aside until you have the skills to determine how to work it ( and you still may end up with nothing) or use it for a non-knife project. Using a known steel does not mean that you have to purchased the steel. It is a 95% good bet that any car/truck leaf spring can make a fair knife. It can be heat treated as if it was 5160, and the HT will almost surely work.......Why?, because these steels are all shallow hardening hypo-eutectoid. It is hard to mess up such steels. On the other hand, a file can be many things. The standard HT is that of 1095, but with hyper-eutectoid steels a lot can change with very little difference in the steel. Such steels need to be qualified before making a knife from them. Other steels , like bed frames, and roadside finds, need to be left alone.

In your early forays into knife making, use a known steel, preferably a purchased steel....with an assay report. You might pay as much as $10 per knife for this, but you will gain a lot more in good results.
 
I can vouch that Kelly (Hellgap) has used a small truckload of known, high quality steel. I suspect he is exploring the pursuit of 'recycled' steel as an interest or branch of knife making. He is certainly not doing it because he is trying to cheap out.

It can be fun to say "This blade was made from an old saw blade from the mill.." There is also a degree of earned pride if you can get it right!

Rob!
 
I know Kelly has gained some experience, but his question was about a list of second use steels and what their exact makeup is. Experienced or not, such a list is not going to be accurate. The second problem with anyone making up such a list is it doesn't take long for some inexperienced maker to find it online, and assume that if someone posted it, it must be true and universal. The other problem is that people read the list backward. If it has :

Plows - 1095
Leaf Springs - 5160
Bearings - 52100

People seem to read the list as saying all springs are 5160, all bearings are 52100 ( and actually, it is the races, not the balls/rollers), etc.
What the list says is that 1095 is used for plows, and 5160 is used for springs. There are other things used, too, 1095 and 5160 is only some of the possibilities.

My advise was an open answer to all who read this thread.
 
The only one that seems reliable is railroad tracks being 1080/1084. The other being just buying a knife with known steel, and making a knife out of that knife.
 
Files are not always 1095. Some well-known brands were tested to have 1.4% carbon, such strange steels are useless for knives.
 
Files are not always 1095. Some well-known brands were tested to have 1.4% carbon, such strange steels are useless for knives.

That's a dumba$$ thing to say, there are steels with that much carbon now that make great knives.
 
That's a dumba$$ thing to say, there are steels with that much carbon now that make great knives.

1.4% carbon and the rest iron? I don't know of any knife steel like that. Even S30V which has 1.4% carbon only gets 0.50% carbon actually dissolved in the austenization, because of the heavy amount of alloys. This is true 1.4% carbon.
 
Back
Top