UFO update - something is going on in China

DannyinJapan

DannyinJapan

Joined
Oct 9, 2003
Messages
5,594
http://www.aolnews.com/weird-news/a...rport-is-there-a-military-connection/19548147

I would like to add that it has been 12 months since the 2009 UFO incident at Purple Mountain, after which the Chinese govt. said they would study the 40-minutes of UFO footage (for 12 months) before releasing it to the public. This footage alone is going to be awesome to see, being official Chinese evidence.

This airport incident is very interesting, as the report implies that the Chinese may have something they are going to announce. What they will say, I have no clue, but I am waiting eagerly for it.
 
DannyinJapan said:
http://www.aolnews.com/weird-news/a...rport-is-there-a-military-connection/19548147

I would like to add that it has been 12 months since the 2009 UFO incident at Purple Mountain, after which the Chinese govt. said they would study the 40-minutes of UFO footage (for 12 months) before releasing it to the public. This footage alone is going to be awesome to see, being official Chinese evidence.

This airport incident is very interesting, as the report implies that the Chinese may have something they are going to announce. What they will say, I have no clue, but I am waiting eagerly for it.
Click to expand...

Following some of those UFO links were pretty interesting as well...:thumbup: :D :cool:

`
​
 
If an ET asked, "Who speaks for Earth?," based on population numbers, the answer would be, "The Chinese ... "

I hope answers, and indeed the proof we've been waiting for, are forthcoming.


Mike :D
 
If you believe Col. Corso, and I do, the proof is already here, in many products and concepts we have been using for years. But propulsion is the one thing we haven't seen and that is all I care about. Keep watching.
 
Have yall seen the photos from the Chinese airport? Just amazing. And it was on ABC news without any sarcastic jokes about "crazy people", which is even more amazing.
Have we crossed the threshold?
Was it a quiet event? That point in time where it became acceptable to report on UFOS in major media?
did I miss it?
 
I saw the video. Interesting ... almost like a slow-moving missile, but with this *bright* white flame exhaust. :cool: Wonder if it was a 1890s-1950s cigar-style ship? WWSFS (What Would Stanton Friedman Say?)

If it was a military test ... they wouldn't have overflown their own civilian airport. If it was someone else's ... they wouldn't have either. :confused:

Oh. The media LOVES ufo stories, but remember the editor's instruction: the people involved are ALL shown to be kooks- or drinking. There HAS to be an explanation ... anything but, well. You know.

Surprised you're not all over that Texas case, where the women in the car were scorched by radioactivity from an "object" - being pursued by helos. The driver got cancer; the car was "hot" as hell and the radioactive pavement and the GROUND was soon removed by gummint workers.


Mike
 
Last edited:
DannyinJapan said:
If you believe Col. Corso, and I do, the proof is already here, in many products and concepts we have been using for years. But propulsion is the one thing we haven't seen and that is all I care about. Keep watching.
Click to expand...

Pretty interesting stuff. What product, etc. are you referring to?

In view of all the oil-related problems we have had lately I'm thinking some UFO-type propulsion would come in mighty handy.
 
Intriguingly, I've been told that the PRC is (or was) the only nation openly willing to entertain the prospect of extraterrestrial explanations for UFOs. After all, the only alternative was to imply that The Enemy had some kind of aircraft that they couldn't stop, and there's no way they'd admit THAT!!!
 
I remember the Texas case. People have actually DIED of radiation sickness from getting too close. (It's a bad way to go) One day you're saying, "look yall, there's a giant egg glowing over the barn". The next day you are bleeding from every orifice and the doctors don't know why.

According to Colonel Corso, many ideas were "harvested" from the Roswell ship and seamlessly worked into already-existing product development projects. Those companies were allowed to patent what they came up with.
(Just like in Terminator 2)
Regardless of where you stand on the UFO issue, it IS very hard to discount his timeline or his credibility. Corso was part of the US security council, worked for three presidents, he was inspector general of the 7th army, worked on the Warren commission and worked for General Arthur Trudeau, a career soldier,chief of Army research and Development during the late 50's-early 60's. (And who, as soon as he retired, became a special adviser to Rockwell International Aerospace labs. Interesting choice of second career, no?)

Apparently the Air force took the ship itself and some "debris" was distributed between the services evenly, but the Army did not begin to try and develop their stuff until the late 50's.

There are not many people I will believe when it comes to UFO data. Paul Hill (NASA), Colonel Corso (ARMY R&D) and Ben Rich (former CEO of Lockheed) are the only 3 right now. (And they all said YES.)

What I find interesting is that Mr Tesla was already working on the concepts of many of these ideas. It struck me how many of the ideas that came out of that ship had already occurred to us, even if we disregarded them before they came to fruition.

Night vision/thermal vision
Fiber optics
Titanium alloys, like Nitinol
Lasers
Alloys with molecular alignment (?)
Integrated circuits (silicon based as opposed to carbon based)
HARP
"Mind-control" headbands for computer input. (which are just now coming to the market)
Particle Beam weapons
Electromagnetic propulsion
Depleted uranium projectiles

I don't know the exact details of how this list came to be. It is important to remember that the armed forces and intelligence community was not organized like it is today until after 1947. They were all separate and competitive, to a degree.
 
I still don't buy the reverse engineering stuff, Danny. If you gave a digital watch to, say, Leonardo da Vinci, he couldn't make another one- or understand what was in it and how it worked.

If we have a crashed saucer or two- and Stanton Friedman indicates we do- I bet our folks *still* can't figure out jack about it. There's just too much gap between us and them. A .45 is of zero use to a cave man. Parts, less so.


Mike
 
Ad Astra said:
A .45 is of zero use to a cave man. Parts, less so.


Mike
Click to expand...

Unless it happens to be loaded, and cocked, then there it just might wind up of use.
Either to the first guy or the one who watched him kill himself with it :)
 
The whole story is incredible. Incredible, meaning "hard to believe." But that doesn't mean it's not true. It is hard to believe, and yet, men of unimpeachable credibility and authority confirm it. The timeline they provide is flawless.

Let me suggest to you that aliens are not that advanced. I think it is very possible that we are more advanced than they are in some areas. It is probable that they simply made different choices about which lines of science to follow. I think the scientific and industrial revolution of the 1800's prepared us to capitalize on what we found. In 1847, no, we'd have no clue what it was, but then, we would not have hidden it and the private sector would have had access and development might have occurred sooner.
But in 1947, the groundwork for understanding had already been laid by various bright people. Yes, I think it did mystify our people how some of it worked. Some of it is only now bearing fruit.
 
Let's not get too carried away by inventions that seem to pop up from nowhere. Trace the science back and you'll see how they fit into a long trail of similar concepts before they actually materialize.

DannyinJapan said:
Let me suggest to you that aliens are not that advanced. I think it is very possible that we are more advanced than they are in some areas.
Click to expand...

An interesting and provable idea. I read an SF story about alien invaders who were practically barbarians who had gotten hold of technology from other aliens that enabled them to look good when they first hit us, but their intellectual deficiencies soon doomed them.

We can test that on Earth by looking at cultures around the world that use advanced personal weaponry, automobiles, cell phones -- but can hardly manufacture plastic toys by themselves.
 
I'll submit that WE are the aliens who will explore and expand into space. It's part of our cultural mind-set to do so.

Some say "Given the vastness of space and the millions and billions of galaxies, stars, solar systems and planets, isn't it probable that other civilizations exist?" Probability is based on past experience. So far, our only experience is our own planet and human race.

I believe we're just on the verge of stellar exploration, like islanders setting off in balsa-wood boats.

But we may get one-upped by explorers from elsewhere, AKA UFO's :D
 
Hey, none of this is my theory. This information comes from sources that trump any of us by a factor of 1000. I don't know anybody that could argue with these men. (You could, but your credibility/authority would be poop compared to them, so why should anyone listen?)

Trace the science back and you'll see how they fit into a long trail of similar concepts before they actually materialize.
Click to expand...

That is what I said in the beginning. Harvested technologies were slipped into ALREADY EXISTING lines of research. That's the camouflage. Feel free to check the timeline and let me know what you find.
 
That's like saying God created the world 5000 years ago with fossils underground and radioactive materials degraded to seem like the world was actually billions of years old.

The ultimate conspiracy theory: evidence that doesn't look like evidence but convinces people who want to believe.
 
No, it's just how things worked. It's the only practical way to develop those "foreign" technologies without alerting foreign intelligence services. This is not just how they dealt with ufo stuff, they do this same routine with any piece of useful stuff we take from the Germans, Russians, Chinese, etc.. That's how things still work today.

Remember when that Orion went down in China? The first thing they did was cut it up so they could discover any of our technological secrets. Will they use them? You know it. Will they give us credit? You know they won't. They'll give P.F. Chang a patent for any secrets they found on that plane. This is simply the process of exploiting foreign technology.

And let me repeat: this isn't MY theory. This is what Colonel Corso openly states and whether you like it or not, his credibility and "pedigree" outshine any contrary opinion you could express. (That's not personal)

If you want to do the homework and prove it isn't true, go for it. I will welcome your evidence and give it a good, objective look.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top