A solid case for sight hounds and an even better case for a dog vs most people.
Rhinoknives1 makes a good case for Airedales. Indeed, at one point in history Airedales were considered to be the ultimate all around dog. They have been used to hunt mice, rats, mink, otters, raccoons, foxes, coyotes, pheasants, ducks, mountain lions, boars, bears and many other species. They were also used as trained protection dogs, much as German Shepherds, Belgian Malnois, etc are today.
Any trainer worth their salt has experienced the same thing. Anyone can with any breed. When you develop a tight bond with your dog and spend a lot of time together, their desire to please and ability to read us feels like the dog is telepathic at times. For me the best hunts are the ones where I never uttered a sound yet we worked as a team and brought home game.
My only reservation with sight hounds is I can hunt what I see by myself. Maybe not as easily, yet I can still hunt it. However with any dog that has a good nose, I can now hunt what it can smell in addition to what we can see. My Drahthaars have found wounded game by following a four day old, one mile long track. Some tracking dogs have followed three mile long, six day old tracks. (In each of those cases the dog was not put on the track until the number of days indicated had elapsed. If they could successfully follow it then, pretty obvious they could have followed it when fresh.) If the dog comes across the trail days later, all is not lost. Even if the meat has spoiled the bones, antlers, possibly the hide, etc could still be used. The carcass could be hunted over, the meat could be used as bait in traps, etc. Something to think about.