- Joined
- Oct 18, 2007
- Messages
- 3,018
I am. It's a little lighter, a little thinner, a little faster. Why all the big hoopla? Sounds like they didn't talk about whether the speakers were better. Same price, same storage, same screen. Boring.
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
My beef with the Android OS is all the different flavors. How come less than 0.4% have the latest OS, while 90%+ of iOS users have the latest software.
Yes indeed. The Android following the Apple. See quote and source below.I prefer Android myself. Apple is all about the sheep following the herd. I'm not one to follow the herd.
asymco said:Android is a fast follower. The first Android prototypes looked like Blackberries because that was the input paradigm of 2006. When capacitive touch was shown to be a better input method, Android reacted swiftly. When app stores created a new medium Android reacted swiftly. When the iPad demonstrated that computing can be done in new settings, Android reacted. At such time when there will be nothing to follow Android will be the king of the last commoditized innovation, but as long as there is something worth inventing Android will be there to reproduce it.
Source: http://www.asymco.com/2011/02/11/two-turkeys-dont-make-an-eagle-but-no-penguin-will-ever-soar/
That's certainly the truth. Part of the problem with previous Android versions was that there was no standard hardware configurations. With so many companies making android devices it was impossible to standardize the features and capabilities of all those products. Subsequently, new versions of the OS were not supported by many of the outdated phones (even if they were only a month old) because they didn't have the necessary hardware specs/features to utilize the newest version of Android to its full potential, or because the companies who made the phones never intended for them to be updated in the first place.
I prefer Android myself. Apple is all about the sheep following the herd. I'm not one to follow the herd.
:jerk it:
I would love to treat Android as a serious contender, but in my experience the Android Market suffers from a dearth of apps, especially high quality apps and games. With the tablet Android Market the problem increases exponentially due to the wide range of screen sizes and resolutions, as well as Android tablets being a whole year behind. The actual Android OS has a lot of great features and some clever design decisions that I'd like to see adopted in iOS but the lack of apps really hurts.
I'd like you to note that there is one new model of iPhone per year and one new model of iPad per year. That's a far cry from the dozens of Android phones to hit the market every year, if not every month. If I missed your point then you missed mine as well: Android manufacturers and carriers tend not to support handset models past the first few months.Also, you say Androids become obsolete in a few months. Heck, last I checked it was Apple that churned out products like no ones business. The iPad is what? 10 months old?
Regarding apps: People place too much emphasis on apps. How many freaking apps does one need?
Apps are like cases lanyards and all that jazz, they are aftermarket digital accessories, why buy a handset because the same store sells a shiney twinkly pink lanyard for it?
To the guy saying Android is following Apple, you misunderstood my reply. I was talking about the fanboys that follow Apple (case in point, guy above with the jerkit smiley). Whether Android is copying Apple is not relevant. In this day and age, what company isn't copying another?
I prefer Android myself. Apple is all about the sheep following the herd. I'm not one to follow the herd.
Nice jerkit smiley. Guess you're one of the Apple flock. Bah bah <---sound of sheep.
To your jerkit smiley, I raise you a :thumbdn: .
To the guy saying Android is following Apple, you misunderstood my reply. I was talking about the fanboys that follow Apple (case in point, guy above with the jerkit smiley). Whether Android is copying Apple is not relevant. In this day and age, what company isn't copying another?
Regarding apps: People place too much emphasis on apps. How many freaking apps does one need? I'm sure both stores have enough apps for what everyone needs. Whether one side has 5 billion and the other side has 1 million shouldn't be a concern (those numbers were arbitrary). It'd be interesting to see the average number of apps a user has on either device. Personally, I keep my phone as barebones as I can. I have only the apps that are essential to my needs. Beyond that, I don't need everything and the kitchen sink.
Games...yea I can see that argument. I'll give you that one.
Also, you say Androids become obsolete in a few months. Heck, last I checked it was Apple that churned out products like no ones business. The iPad is what? 10 months old? The iPad2 is such a HUGE upgrade from the first iPad! (sarcasm for you dense people). The rumor says a third iPad will come out in October with a higher resolution.
There's a term for that that I once learned in an economics class, that I don't recall right now. It's where a company pushes out a products with little upgrades just so the company can continue releasing "revised" editions because people WILL buy them. If that's fine for people, more power to them.
I think I'll stick with Android.