Square_peg
Gold Member
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2012
- Messages
- 13,793
Sears was known to switch suppliers from year to year. But Mann (and Vaughan) were also known to use eye ridges. My guess is you have an example of the latter.
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
It has also been said that the "M" in a Sears mark is a mfr code for Vaughan. If it is a Vaughan then True Temper was not the only manufacturer to make an axe ". . .with eye ribs (2 wide, opposite 2 narrow)". On the other hand, if it is not a Vaughan then the "M" cannot be used as a reliable indicator.Sears was known to switch suppliers from year to year. But Mann (and Vaughan) were also known to use eye ridges. My guess is you have an example of the latter.
Yeah, the M was used by sears on all Vaughan & Bushnell produced tools and I think may still be today ( i keep seeing new ones but am always told it's been NOS stuff since 2012 ), so this one has to be Vaughan.It's already been established that numerous other makes besides True Temper use eye ridges. True Temper seems to have been first (and patented). But we've seen Vaughan, Collins and Plumb axes with eye ridges, too.
Most found today are True Tempers. But you're never certain without a stamp. Being a Sears and having the 'M' stamp that one is most likely a Vaughan.
Thanks again Steve! Good info 2 days in a row!
Anyone know the significance of the
C 32 stamp?
I don't have much to add as far as which North American axe company manufactured these red 4 ridge Jerseys. But I have a personal weakness for them. They are fairly abundant at garage sales around here, often with minimal use but signs casual abuse. I have three basically identical to gben's original pic, (originally red, same weight, 4 eye ridges, one definitely had a paper label so likely they all did). The only major difference is that two of them are stamped A 7 on the left cheek where the label would have been.
![]()
I just brought this home last week with a few others.
![]()
Head looks very similar, same red paint, 4 ridges, only visible markings are what looks like a backwards "C" and "43".
![]()
Steel is very hard....just about wore out a file on it. De-rusted, sharpened, and re-hung on the same handle I got with it. It was hung with one metal wedge in the kerf. Made pulling the handle real easy. Another nice $3 user to the herd.
It's a tough decision to know where to post this, here or "it followed me home".
No name Dbl bit cruiser 8.5 bit to bit, the bits are 4.375. only marking is C8.
![]()
Only 4 ridges
![]()
The stamp/marking
![]()
Picked up a hatchet with ridges. Only marking is C31
![]()
![]()
It will look good next to its big brother. Boys axe with the same eye ridge configuration.
![]()
How do you know they are True Temper axes?Don't know if it's been mentioned before but according to one of their old forge operators the code stood for the Hammer that the tool was forged on followed by the batch number. So A29 would be hammer A batch number 29.
Oddly enough I have several unmarked TrueTemper axes, not a single one has this QC code stamped on it. They are some darn fine axes as well. Just used a couple of them on a camping trip this past weekend to buck dead fall and split out kindling. Couldn't have asked for better tools.
How do you know they are True Temper axes?
So a basic summary . . . (please let me know if anyone disagrees). . .
I don't know of any, but on the other hand have there been examples presented of a "TT ridged eye head that has the letter-numbers stamp" with no other markings?
- To my knowledge no example has been presented of a non TT ridged eye head that has the letter-numbers stamp.
I don't know of any, but on the other hand have there been examples presented of a "TT ridged eye head that has the letter-numbers stamp" with no other markings?
Bob
To my knowledge no. Not a 100% known head with all the other trates but no makers mark. Several have been presented (including mine) that have the ridges and letter number stamp... but no maker mark. But I wouldn’t say they are 100% known. I would say very high certainty based on the features listed.
I guess in order to know for sure the maker of a unmarked head one would need to know the back story of the head, or, the head has a feature that is linked exclusively to a brand. Is the mysterious letter number stamp exclusive to true temper? I guess that’s the million $ question.
To my knowledge no. Not a 100% known head with all the other trates but no makers mark. Several have been presented (including mine) that have the ridges and letter number stamp... but no maker mark. But I wouldn’t say they are 100% known. I would say very high certainty based on the features listed.
I guess in order to know for sure the maker of a unmarked head one would need to know the back story of the head, or, the head has a feature that is linked exclusively to a brand.
I guess we can't refer to these marks as alpha/numeric any more.
The star seems to be fairly common. It’s the only symbol I recall seeing.I guess we can't refer to these marks as alpha/numeric any more.
Bob
Here is a Kelly from a camp kit that I can place to the early sixties with a foil label. No mention of safety goggles. And no eye ridges either.Holy smokes Steve! Informative pictures. Not only does the Woodslasher label on that unstamped head (model 35M2K) indicate that there are eye ridges but it also says 'wear safety goggles'. Same goes with the double bit Woodslasher (model 25M2K) without eye ridges. If I recall 'wear safety goggles' became compulsory print on n. American striking tools in the mid to late 1970s. Perhaps TT was ahead of it's time and was already labelling them with such a warning before 1960, or else the double bit was manufactured sometime after 1982.