I think it would be a really good move for Buck to license the Remington name and to move all/most of their lower end offerings and imported knives under the Remington brand name. That would allow Buck to solidify their US made mid and upper tier knives under the Buck brand, which would keep the Buck name stronger. IMO, diluting the Buck brand with low end knives and imports isn't so good. Could be a win/win.
The "low end" and imports are putting a Buck knife in the hands/pockets of consumers.
How is that a "bad" thing?
I'm not sure which knives you are accusing of being "low end", so I cannot comment on that, other than to say "Buck (IMHO) does not make a "low end" knife. They may make some that are (relatively) inexpensive, but they are not a "low end" knife like an M-Tec or Frost, for example."
As for the imported knives, I have a few of the imported 300 series.
They are not a sub-par knife, and are of as high quality as the Idaho made knives.
Also, they put a Buck knife in the pocket of someone who cannot afford an Idaho made knife. (roughly $20 - $23 for a 371, for example, is more affordable than the roughly $40 - $45 for a 301. I cannot afford a 301, but I can afford the 371.)
Also, (sticking with the 300 series) there isn't an Idaho made version of every imported pattern. The 389 Canoe, for instance. There is no Idaho made Canoe.
"Purists" may bemoan that Buck imports some of their knives. The "average" knife buyer? I doubt they give a flying blue bird of paradise's fart.
Lastly, if they did license the name, that does not mean the licenseing is a permanent arrangement.
Look at the SMKW/Colt licensing. I don't know the details, but, SMKW lost the license to use the popular Colt brand name.