As I acquire more knives, I feel I need to get more creative in justifying each purchase, as if each new knife should offer something functionally not found in those I currently own, or at least possess a unique combination of useful features. Or so I tell my wife. The features I value most are how easy to carry a knife is, how well it feels in my hand, how good a slicer it is, and the usable blade length. Blade length also is relevant to certain rules and restrictions I may face, depending on where in my community I go, so a little variety in blade length is good. I also appreciate variety in handle materials and steels. I may perceive one knife as my "gentleman's carry" and another my hard use camping knife, but the above are the characteristics that most influence my opinion of a prospective knife.
The usable blade length is a concept I employ, but I don't know if this is just my own idiosyncrasy or whether others think the same way. I like to use a "Filipino" saber grip when I need to grip a knife firmly, with the thumb on the spine of the blade. In this grip, I consider the "usable blade length" that portion of the cutting edge from the tip of the blade to the point on the cutting edge immediately across from the tip of my thumb on the blade spine. If I'm slicing through something with my thumb on the blade spine, I don't want my thumb to come in contact with it, so that limits the length of the blade that's useful. Does that make sense?
I used to focus on the length of the cutting edge as the critical blade length, until I realized the above limitation on what portion of the blade may be useful – at least for certain tasks. The cutting edge length on my SpydieChef and that of my ZT 0609 are almost identical at about 3.3 inches. I thought of them both as having a slightly longer usable blade than my PM2, which has a cutting edge of about 3.1 inches. However, as described above the usable blade length of these knives is 2.6 inches for the SpydieChef, 2.7 inches for the 0609, and 3.1 inches for the PM2. I can essentially use all the PM2's cutting edge due to where my thumb rests, behind the point where the cutting edge starts. The PM2 has a longer handle, so that may make sense.
I guess I'm looking for validation of this concept because I'll find it easier then to rationalize the purchase of a certain knife I have my eye on buying. I welcome any enabling you may provide.
The usable blade length is a concept I employ, but I don't know if this is just my own idiosyncrasy or whether others think the same way. I like to use a "Filipino" saber grip when I need to grip a knife firmly, with the thumb on the spine of the blade. In this grip, I consider the "usable blade length" that portion of the cutting edge from the tip of the blade to the point on the cutting edge immediately across from the tip of my thumb on the blade spine. If I'm slicing through something with my thumb on the blade spine, I don't want my thumb to come in contact with it, so that limits the length of the blade that's useful. Does that make sense?
I used to focus on the length of the cutting edge as the critical blade length, until I realized the above limitation on what portion of the blade may be useful – at least for certain tasks. The cutting edge length on my SpydieChef and that of my ZT 0609 are almost identical at about 3.3 inches. I thought of them both as having a slightly longer usable blade than my PM2, which has a cutting edge of about 3.1 inches. However, as described above the usable blade length of these knives is 2.6 inches for the SpydieChef, 2.7 inches for the 0609, and 3.1 inches for the PM2. I can essentially use all the PM2's cutting edge due to where my thumb rests, behind the point where the cutting edge starts. The PM2 has a longer handle, so that may make sense.
I guess I'm looking for validation of this concept because I'll find it easier then to rationalize the purchase of a certain knife I have my eye on buying. I welcome any enabling you may provide.