The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is available! Price is $250 ea (shipped within CONUS).
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/
Did you notice additional resistance with this knife over the S90V?
THAT is "push cutting?"
ANY of my knives will drag through TP like that.
I always called push cutting the simple push on the edge of the paper starting the cut.
The top of the paper isn't shown in that video.
Video or it didn't happen.![]()
THAT is "push cutting?"
I always thought push-cutting was the same motion one would use to shave one's face (ie: pushing the blade in a direction perpendicular to the edge)... If I tried to shave my face with the motion in the video, I'd be needing some serious stitches.
I thought this was push cutting:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hi3MH8Ks9mM
Still, slicing through free-hanging TP like that is a damn impressive feat for a knife. That's wicked sharp!
THAT is "push cutting?"
ANY of my knives will drag through TP like that.
I always called push cutting the simple push on the edge of the paper starting the cut.
The top of the paper isn't shown in that video.
YEAH !!!
Nyaah nyaah on the video! It was SLICING! Bwaaahhhhh....
VINDICATION !!!
![]()
When are you coming out with your impressions videos on the Para 2 S30V and the Manix 2 CTS-XHP Jim? I've been checking. Are you going to shoot them?![]()
You outdid yourself again, Jim! If you ever make it to BC, I have a beer waiting for ya. :thumbup:
And I thought push-cutting should be 90° to the object being cut.
Me too. In the video the blade is nearly parallel to the paper.
Let's see you guys post videos of your sharpened knives slicing toilet paper. I think we're splitting hairs here wouldn't you agree?![]()
Description of Ad Hominem
Translated from Latin to English, "Ad Hominem" means "against the man" or "against the person."
An Ad Hominem is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument. Typically, this fallacy involves two steps. First, an attack against the character of person making the claim, her circumstances, or her actions is made (or the character, circumstances, or actions of the person reporting the claim). Second, this attack is taken to be evidence against the claim or argument the person in question is making (or presenting). This type of "argument" has the following form:
1. Person A makes claim X.
2. Person B makes an attack on person A.
3. Therefore A's claim is false.