- Joined
- Jun 5, 2012
- Messages
- 1,071
I've been using these long enough that I have grown to like them quite a bit, but I recently stepped up to 36 grit now that I'm comfortable with my grinding, and the VSM 36 has been just as impressive as (if not more so than) the 50-100 grit VSM I've been using previously. The overall behavior seems very similar between grits.
I continue to be highly impressed with the VSM belts for performance vs. cost.
This is an XK760X VSM 36g ceramic. I used it to grind the Santoku blade shown below from a pre-hardened full thickness blank at 5/32", and it still looks almost new.
This is with about 1.5hrs of non stop grinding on CTS-XHP @ 61rc! I went from full thickness (profile only, no rough grind before HT) to full flat ground with full distal taper and zero edge.
I do grind with a light touch and slightly different style than most, but that is just plain impressive.
The wear shown also includes some light profiling and re-fracturing the abrasive while grinding a tang slightly shorter on another blade.
(this is after finishing just fyi)
This is the VSM next to a value ceramic with approximately the same amount of use. I ground two slightly smaller blades, with it, but the overall material removal and time spent was very similar.
Not exactly scientific, but the belt on the right has been a typical result for me with value belts with this much use.
The VSM and some of the other quality ceramic belts have a somewhat glossy looking binder, whereas the cheaper standard or value belts seem to have a more chalky binder, both in appearance and wear.
My assumption so far (which may be totally incorrect) is that the value belts have a lot more filler in the binder resin, to try and be more cost effective. They tend to be less flexible, more crumbly, shed grit faster, and the binder itself wears faster.
The binder on the VSM is more glossy and plastic, so I suspect it uses more resin with less filler to give it more flexibility and toughness. Once again, just guesses, but guesses from experience with custom filled resins.
I continue to be highly impressed with the VSM belts for performance vs. cost.
This is an XK760X VSM 36g ceramic. I used it to grind the Santoku blade shown below from a pre-hardened full thickness blank at 5/32", and it still looks almost new.
This is with about 1.5hrs of non stop grinding on CTS-XHP @ 61rc! I went from full thickness (profile only, no rough grind before HT) to full flat ground with full distal taper and zero edge.
I do grind with a light touch and slightly different style than most, but that is just plain impressive.
The wear shown also includes some light profiling and re-fracturing the abrasive while grinding a tang slightly shorter on another blade.
(this is after finishing just fyi)
This is the VSM next to a value ceramic with approximately the same amount of use. I ground two slightly smaller blades, with it, but the overall material removal and time spent was very similar.
Not exactly scientific, but the belt on the right has been a typical result for me with value belts with this much use.
The VSM and some of the other quality ceramic belts have a somewhat glossy looking binder, whereas the cheaper standard or value belts seem to have a more chalky binder, both in appearance and wear.
My assumption so far (which may be totally incorrect) is that the value belts have a lot more filler in the binder resin, to try and be more cost effective. They tend to be less flexible, more crumbly, shed grit faster, and the binder itself wears faster.
The binder on the VSM is more glossy and plastic, so I suspect it uses more resin with less filler to give it more flexibility and toughness. Once again, just guesses, but guesses from experience with custom filled resins.
Last edited: