- Joined
- Oct 12, 1998
- Messages
- 1,647
Got into work this morning and found in the mailroom, to my surprise, the extra office copy of the Wall Street Journal, with an article on the middle of the front page entitled: "Blade Brothers Vie to Make the Cut In a Whack Attack", with the subheading, "Knife Makers Compete to Be the Sharpest One of All; Mr. Harley and His Boars". The article goes on to describe the recent gathering of knifemakers at Texarkana College's School of Bladesmithing. It describes some of the tests to determine blade sharpness, and mentions a number of makers by name. Their list includes Jim Crowell, Reggie Barker, Jerry Fisk, John Fitch, Tim Foster, Jarrell Lambert, Ray Kirk, and of course, Larry Harley. There's even a small digression about Mr. Harley's knife-only boar hunts.
The report seems surprisingly positive, describing the men as blade brothers, their common "Arthurian love of knives", and mentions "the small, but highly lucrative world of custom knife making, where prize blades sell for thousands of dollars." Only one small paragraph talks about how these knives aren't common pocket knives, but weapons capable of great damage ("lopping of a man's arm with one savage whack"). Mention is made of old laws that outlaw carry of such knives, and how for safety's sake, the contestants were required to secure the knife to their wrist for the crowd's protection. This one paragraph , with the exception of the above quote, seems otherwise unbiased, simply the statement of fact. I'm pretty pleased about the overall tone of the article. It doesn't seem to portray knife aficionados as closet nutcases, and aside of the mention of Larry Harley's boar hunts (which would of course offend animal rights and anti-hunting groups), doesn't seem to give any specific group of "anti's" ammunition to further erode and attack our hobby.
If you have an opportunity to read the article, I would recommend it. You may read it a bit differently than I did, so if you get a different take out of it, let us know. I tried to track a link through the Journal's online service, but it seems it's subscriber-only, so I can't furnish a link here. Anyone have subscriber access to the WSJ? It would be great to post a link for all those interested here to see the article for themselves.
The report seems surprisingly positive, describing the men as blade brothers, their common "Arthurian love of knives", and mentions "the small, but highly lucrative world of custom knife making, where prize blades sell for thousands of dollars." Only one small paragraph talks about how these knives aren't common pocket knives, but weapons capable of great damage ("lopping of a man's arm with one savage whack"). Mention is made of old laws that outlaw carry of such knives, and how for safety's sake, the contestants were required to secure the knife to their wrist for the crowd's protection. This one paragraph , with the exception of the above quote, seems otherwise unbiased, simply the statement of fact. I'm pretty pleased about the overall tone of the article. It doesn't seem to portray knife aficionados as closet nutcases, and aside of the mention of Larry Harley's boar hunts (which would of course offend animal rights and anti-hunting groups), doesn't seem to give any specific group of "anti's" ammunition to further erode and attack our hobby.
If you have an opportunity to read the article, I would recommend it. You may read it a bit differently than I did, so if you get a different take out of it, let us know. I tried to track a link through the Journal's online service, but it seems it's subscriber-only, so I can't furnish a link here. Anyone have subscriber access to the WSJ? It would be great to post a link for all those interested here to see the article for themselves.