Does Buck sell Grade 'B' product to Walmart?
In a discussion in the MultiTool sub-forum recently, there was a discussion about a Learherman Wave that was purchased at Walmart and that has QC issues.
One of the responders suggested that a) manufacturers grade product and b) that Walmart gets these grade 'B' products to meet their low price point pressure. He discusses the example of lower grade Remington shotguns at Walmart.
HUGE CAVEAT: the poster notes this is not based on sound sources and may definitely not be true.
Has anybody heard of such a practice with Walmart (or other low price retailers) and more to the point, does Buck do this?
The post is here
In a discussion in the MultiTool sub-forum recently, there was a discussion about a Learherman Wave that was purchased at Walmart and that has QC issues.
One of the responders suggested that a) manufacturers grade product and b) that Walmart gets these grade 'B' products to meet their low price point pressure. He discusses the example of lower grade Remington shotguns at Walmart.
HUGE CAVEAT: the poster notes this is not based on sound sources and may definitely not be true.
Has anybody heard of such a practice with Walmart (or other low price retailers) and more to the point, does Buck do this?
The post is here
Look, it may be second-hand hearsay, and innuendo, so take this with a huge grain of salt, maybe a lick-block worth. Walmart has in the past purchased what would be considered lower grade products from some manufacturers to save cost. For example, take something like a remington 870. there is no functional difference between an express and a wingmaster, just cleaner fit and finish, an probably polish. So at each assembly stage they get graded into the category. So an express that gets downgraded a few more times, maybe the checkering is a bit rougher than normal, and the stock match-up isn't quite there might get done down to police special and sold that way, or sold through a club discount thing. Thats assuming that internally its to spec, which I would say the focus would be on. That allows them to sell more of the units produced, instead of having to scrap a percentage. Walmart steps in and says, we will buy x units at y cost. Well below the standard wholesale price. So then they have a choice, be in a big part of the market, and make the sale, or restrict themselves to a narrower market, and take the loss. Now this is not to say that Remington would sell a crappy gun, but given the chance to sell a gun to someone who is willing to sacrifice a little to get a good price, they may do so. A rough 870 is still a great shotgun, and a flaw in the bluing isn't going to worry a walmat buyer, where it would from a smaller dedicated gun-shop. I've noticed that other brands of products that are sold there at a significant discount from other stores, tend to not look as good as the more expensive versions, that ranges from fishing rods to garden hoses. Now buying power makes up for a lot of the end retail price, but there are limits. There is a reason that walmart sells what it sells, to who it sells.
Now all that being said, would walmart take a known bad return, put it back on the shelf and sell it? probably right in the manual. So I hope that its not a move on Leatherman's part to let some rougher stuff slide into the supply stream, since it would only hurt them long term. Some products have a much lower tolerance than others. no-one is going to care if their garden hose lasts 5 years instead of 7, or if the oil they buy for their mower is only 80% as good as stuff from another store. Heck, even a bad rifle will outshoot most guys, and they might never notice that its a little rougher than one that was hand-picked for a smaller mom-pop shop. but a multi-tool that you use nearly every day will show its flaws much faster.
This isn't a bash on them, there are plenty of other places for that sort of thing, and that's not here. they have a business model that works in a certain way, and to the best of my understanding, thats how it works. I could be fully wrong, and have no actual evidence to support any statements made. I'm merely elaborating on a statement made, in response to a question asked. that should C my A enough I think....