- Joined
- Sep 8, 2013
- Messages
- 520
This thread is mostly speculation based on my observation of one of my grandfather's knives, a Utica "Kutmaster". Yes, I know this knife was mainly designed to cut twigs and pruning bushes, but compared to other knives I have seen (or whats left of them anyway) from the 1910-1945 period, it's pretty hefty. Could this be one of the ancestors of todays "pocket brick" tactical knife?
I also wonder if back during the world wars soldiers compared their folders and had conversations like "my Camillus has better carbon steel than your Case" or "My TL-29 is better than yours because its made by...."
While the idea of someone actually using a traditional folder in combat "tactically" seems absurd (although considering the amount of fighting going on it could have happened), I wonder if the soldiers then viewed certain folders to be more suited for hard use (and tactical use) than others? I think that if soldiers today can call a folding blade they don't generally use for fighting, but do use for daily military tasks "tactical", than there might have been some "tactical" traditionals back in the early 1900's and World War era.
Your thoughts?
I also wonder if back during the world wars soldiers compared their folders and had conversations like "my Camillus has better carbon steel than your Case" or "My TL-29 is better than yours because its made by...."
While the idea of someone actually using a traditional folder in combat "tactically" seems absurd (although considering the amount of fighting going on it could have happened), I wonder if the soldiers then viewed certain folders to be more suited for hard use (and tactical use) than others? I think that if soldiers today can call a folding blade they don't generally use for fighting, but do use for daily military tasks "tactical", than there might have been some "tactical" traditionals back in the early 1900's and World War era.
Your thoughts?