I find the Katana interesting but, frankly, overrrated. And also a bit small for me. Really, it is a sword that can be used with one hand but is better used with two, right? That puts it into the hand and a half, or bastard, sword category for me. That means it definately should be larger. And when you consider historical Katanas were often shorter than modern pieces you wind up with a short saber.
Combat sword developement was effectively ended by firearms, not design excellence. Fewer swords on the battlefield and more bayonets/pikes, though really the pike/spear was always the primary weapon of the lowly soldier.
Worth noting that most of the regulation "service" swords went to the saber style.
Combat sword developement was effectively ended by firearms, not design excellence. Fewer swords on the battlefield and more bayonets/pikes, though really the pike/spear was always the primary weapon of the lowly soldier.
Worth noting that most of the regulation "service" swords went to the saber style.