The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
I think Randall is more market-driven. As long as they've got five years' of orders in the queue and no limit on dealers and individuals wanting their knives, I mean... why change anything? No need to modernize their materials or improve their fit and finish when they can already sell more than they can make.Unfortunately I think Randall relies on their name alone at this point. CRK at least updates their steel and comes out with new products.
I thnk the Farid K2 was a competitor too. It is an amazing knifeI think the short answer to that is no. I don’t think there is a blade made in the USA for less than $500 that can compete with a Sebenza and the lifetime warranty that comes with being the original owner.
If you’re looking for something close to the Sebenza (with all titanium construction and frame lock) that is less than $500, I would look closely at the Spyderco Ti models (Spydiechef, and Swayback). These models are made in Taiwan, but belong to an elite group of folders produced by an American company with the same lifetime warranty offered by CRK.
Hey all.
Since reading more and watching more videos on knives I have grown to appreciate more those knives that before I would’ve never looked a second time at.
One of these knives is the Chris Reeve Knives SEBENZA in the LARGE size. I don’t own any expensive knives, but I do own and carry some nice folders, all factory stuff though.
I am saving a bit here and there to one day soon buy one of these “grail” knives. What I am wanting to know is what other folders out there would be considered competitors to the large SEBENZA. Folders of the same quality and workmanship, size and price. I like bigger blades. Maybe competitors is the wrong word. I guess a better way to phrase it would be knives that are thought of and looked at like the SEBENZA is.
Right now the ones I have on my list are:
1. Chris Reeve Knives large SEBENZA
2. Chris Reeve Knives UMNUMZAAN
3. Microtech SOCOM BRAVO
4. Freeman 451
So far those are all I have. I would like to keep the price at $500. I simply cannot afford to spend the money it takes to get one of these incredible customs.
I haven’t decided yet on whether to add autos to my list. Maybe I’ll work on the folder/flipper first and after I get that, I can start a new one for autos.
What other folder/flipper knives should be on my list? What knives do you consider to be equal to or maybe better than the SEBENZA?
My plan is to get a list of possibles, visit some shops and handle each one and then decide on which one to buy. The one I pick will go in my pocket immediately and will be carried and used prolly the rest of my time here.
Any suggestions or info you care to share is appreciated.
Thank you for your help and time.
MUHerd
I am in your court. I own both CRK and Olamics. I don't hesitate to carry an Olamic. I did not bring them up because the cost is higher. They offer different steels, blade shapes and you design them.WTF? No one has mentioned Olamic yet?
I've never handled a CRK but just based on appearance and price, I certainly think that it's certainly "competitive" w/CRK.
Here's a (very poor) pic of my 3 Ti framleock Olamics. The Rainmaker and Wayfarer 247 (top and bottom) were made w/ M390 steel (as marked). The blade of the Swish (center) is unmarked but was probably made w/Bohler Elmax because that's how most Swish knives for sale are described in their specs.
IMO, M390 and Elmax are better (or at least "worth more") than the S35VN used by CRK in making its knives but you can call it a "push" if you like.
I also think that it's a "push" as far as the Ti and quality of construction from what I've seen/read about CRKs but Olamic is far superior to CRK in terms of design options which just makes CRKs look BORING in comparison.
For more and better pics of what Olamic has to offer, see this BF Olamic owners thread, here. Or just go to Olamic's website.
![]()
PS: I own (and have owned) quite a few Spyderco Ti knives with both frame and integral locks and while they are nice, they are very hard to come by and, like CRKs, are kinda boring in comparison based strictly on appearance and design, although I am particularly fond of my Nirvana, Drunken.and fluted Ti Millie.
I am in your court. I own both CRK and Olamics. I don't hesitate to carry an Olamic. I did not bring them up because the cost is higher. They offer different steels, blade shapes and you design them.
FWIW, while the list price for Olamics is in the $700+ range, I didn't pay any more than $425 for any of mine which is iess than the asking price of most of the CRKs that I've seen for sale on the Exchange and elsewhere.
I have both Olamics and CRKs, I like them both but your post brought up an interesting point that even though the Olamics can be more expensive new, have more interesting designs, more playful action and have more steel options, they do not hold their value as well in the exchange