- Joined
- Feb 22, 2007
- Messages
- 9,008
I'd want to include heat treatment in that definition. As we all know, the heat treatment is just as important as the steel used. Without a good HT, even a perfectly symmetrical, awesomely swedged blade is no better than fancy letter opener.
The problem is that farming out blades to be HT'd is a commonly accepted practice. I'd like to point though out that the masters (Bill Bagwell, Tony Bose, Don Fogg, et al.) HT their blades themselves.
- Christian
That is a great point to keep in mind, Christian. I am not commenting on the "masters" in my words to follow but, to play the Devil's advocate in a way, I would actually prefer "young" makers do send the parts to a true master rather than customers spending lots of money on so so knives to support their learning experience. I don't say that in a hurtful way or in a way that I don't want to help "young" makers, but say you have a maker that has a real talent for everything else and they haven't mastered heat treat yet...? You could look at it in the same way for a company that may send off parts to a true master. I would prefer that over a mediocre in house heat treat, personally.
I do completely agree with you, but your comment sparked a few thoughts.
What would bother me is if a maker marketed knives as completely in house and they were not. As long as all details are disclosed I don't mind heat treats out of house, just so long as its to one of the masters.
Sometimes collaborations can give us some really amazing results.
Kevin