- Joined
- Oct 19, 2009
- Messages
- 707

When I see the term "super steel" I tend to think of particle metallurgy stainless: Crucible S90V, Carpenter CTS20CP, Bohler M390, Hitachi ZDP189, Takefu Super Gold, Daido Cowry-X, etc.
But then I remember alloys that are missing one or both of those traits (stainless+PM) yet possess some kind of advantage over run-o-the-mill steels: CPM-M4, Super Blue, BG42, 3V, INFI, H1, etc. They excel in at least one performance category, but not all.
Then I can't help but wonder who coined "super steel" and when. Was it back in the 80's when 440C was the standard of cutlery grade stainless? Was 154CM the original "super steel" ? AFAIK it was the first stainless to be used in large quantities as an upgrade to 440C. If so then ATS-34 would be a "super steel" too, right? And surely VG-10 which many folks prefer over 154CM/ATS-34.
440C was and still is a vast improvement over plain carbon steel in terms of corrosion. And it's superior to 420 in terms of edge holding. At one time good old 440C was as "super" as you could get.
This is where I always end up, in a semantic query. Is "super steel" just a relative term having no meaning outside of a specific comparison? Or is it a vague reference to the current state of the art? I think it's generally synonymous with "New & Improved" but is the emphasis on the former or the latter?
What do you think?