Guys, this has been discussed ad infinitum in these forums. I can just hear a lot of folks saying "oh no, not this one again." I'll try to give you the answer this time. Use the search function to check out previous answers to this question. It is amusing to me how a modern marketing ploy can become something almost like religious dogma.
Simply, the 'blood groove' has nothing at all to do with blood, or suction, or anything like that at all. In ancient Japanese swords, those of superior quality had a very wide groove gouged out near the spine of the blade. It is more properly called a 'fuller'. This lightens the blade and makes it faster without losing any structural integrity, kind of like the steel I-beam's used in construction. In modern hunters and fighters, the groove was added mostly for decoration and has become so small (narrow) that it serves no functional or structural purpose.
If you don't believe this, check previous threads in this forum, and read magazines like Knife World, which ran an article on this topic recently, including a historical perspective of the marketing campaign by Marbles Corp earlier this century in which this idea of calling a small fuller a 'blood groove' first appeared in this country. Early on, some companies used very wide fullers on hunting blades to lighten them. Over time, the fuller became smaller and smaller until its presence did nothing for blade performance at all. It's is purely decorative and nothing but marketing hype!
Although it does Sound logical, there is no suction pulling on a blade inserted into a body cavity. A blade with or without a 'blood groove' will seal the wound around the knife from tissue pressure and a small amount of blood. the pressure in the interior of the body is not negative relative to the outside air. It is the same. It is a good idea to leave a penetrating knife where it is until you can seek proper medical attention. Once the blade is removed, the rate of blood loss will increase dramatically. Although for most deep penetrating wounds involving major arteries, I doubt there would be enough time to get life saving medical attention in any case.
Paracelsus
[This message has been edited by Paracelsus (edited 06 December 1999).]