

The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
I don t think that I understand this , Richard ? Can you explain to me what you mean with that ?PS @Horsewright you might not have convinced N Natlek of anything, but that's fine. He routinely does the "impossible" like drilling hardened steel.
Joking, because it seems that every few weeks you have to show pictures to convince someone that you often choose to drill hardened steel, which many aren't aware is possible.I don t think that I understand this , Richard ? Can you explain to me what you mean with that ?
Sorry Stacy, I was typing while you posted.OK guys, this is Blankblanks thread about knifemaking, not the place to argue past differences!
There really isn't one diffinative definition of a knife maker, I would still consider you to be a knife maker if you design a knife in CAD, hire someone to have it cut out of steel with a CNC machine, have the blade sent to a professional for heat treatment, with your hands on contribution to the knifes manufacture only consisting of the bevels and a handle. I somewhat arbitrarily exclude people who exclusively assemble kit knives that are designed by other people(nothing wrong with doing so I just think of it as actually making the knife), and I also exclude designers who have no direct involvement in turning their designs into reality. There are a lot of shades of gray where someone could be considered to either be a knife maker or not be a knife maker with both sides having valid points.So if anyone has seen my first thread. I've had some ideas presented to me, and I'm trying to change what I view as knife making. Its brought some questions to my mind though. This thread is just out of curiosity, and to possibly grow in my understanding and feelings on what a knife maker is. In the end it's all in the eye of the beholder.
When does someone stop being a knife maker? Or rather than not being a knife maker, when is it not making a knife? Is someone that buys a knife making kit with a reshaped blank, and all the materials they need a knife maker? If someone takes an existing knife, and modifies it to the point of being unrecognizable. Have they made a new knife?
I feel like the feelings I had about it, were contributed to by the fact that when people would ask if I forged this knife. I would tell them, no you really dont want to forge these steels. Because they watched forged in fire they would think that's the only way to make a knife. So having people question me. Made me question myself.
This thread is just something to think about I guess.
Mike - the poet in you comes out!"the word is not the thing" - Korzybski
makes sense to meWho cares !!!!!
Obviously not you. I know it's not of life or death thing. It's just a questionWho cares !!!!!
I think the point is that no one thinks you should not do the work you can do around knifemaking because you're worried about whether it fits the definition. Make some stuff from a kit, mod some production knives, make your own with someone else heat-treating them, heat treat your own. Do all of it.Obviously not you. I know it's not of life or death thing. It's just a question
I like the japanese kitchen knife making world. Depending on the region, they tend to have different people that do different parts. One guy will just do the forging, one will grind the bevels on the big water wheels (I believe they call them sharpeners) then sometimes they'll have someone else for polishing. They have someone else that does handles. I believe sakai tends to divide labor like this.There will be only opinions. And here's more!
Mostly rambling thoughts, but my ultimate conclusion has already been stated by others: language is imprecise, context is important, and the final definition is impossible - especially in a living language.
Definitions:
Must a knife be steel? In the current dictionary definition, you just need a cutting edge on a handle.
If you knap a stone knife, I would argue you are a knifemaker.
If you whittle a knife out of wood, I would argue you are a knifemaker.
If you cast or stamp a knife, I would argue you are a knifemaker.
Even in the steel world, there is the slippery definition of when something 'becomes' a knife. Is it after quench? If it's a hidden tang or folder blade it has no handle so it defies our dictionary definition.
If you ever want to get really frustrated, look at some of the laws on the books about knives. Most knife types are undefined or poorly defined.
I would offer up "bladesmith" as the term that requires forging of the blade. It would be a subset of "knifemaker", and may provide a more exact description (where appropriate).
We on this forum are biased to making quality steel blades. So in context, knifemaker can be assumed to eliminate stone, etc.
The world is full of the living language mutations. A putty knife sorta cuts. A gamma knife uses radiation. Are scissors knives? (See arguments about Edward Scissorhands vs Edward Bladehands)
I also like to look to the outside world for analogies.
If you write something, you are an author. But if you modify something, you are an editor. But it's never that simple.
You can be a co-author, a contributing author, an aggregator, a copy editor, a content editor, a substantive editor... the list goes on. Apply all of these to knife making and you can make up your own term that has value.
Have you made any progress with your ventures?I like the japanese kitchen knife making world. Depending on the region, they tend to have different people that do different parts. One guy will just do the forging, one will grind the bevels on the big water wheels (I believe they call them sharpeners) then sometimes they'll have someone else for polishing. They have someone else that does handles. I believe sakai tends to divide labor like this.
Then you have other japanese makers that will do everything themselves from forging, to putting handles on, to sharpening. In the cases of the effort of a whole group making the knife, like sakai knife makers they will have the collective as there now. Or sometimes it will be named after the one that forges, or whoever in the groups name has the most recognition, or there is the case of anryu himono where ikeda san has been basically making all the knives for years, because his uncle has stepped back and let him take over the business (to some degree, without going into it to far)