Interesting thread indeed. I feel the same regarding the information provided to customer by OKC for blade steel or blade hardness. The data are not consistent, whatever are the sources: dealers, websites, OKC Internet site, ... (and I am a fan of the J. Gingrich or Ontario styles). Therefore I am a little bit disapointed by the Ontario communication, as no reliable information is provided to the customer.
For instance, I collect the following information concerning RAT 1095 blade hardness:
- 55/57 Rc
- 56/58 Rc
- 56/57 Rc
- 57/58 Rc
- "What else?"
So, what is the right one? What is the information one can rely on?
I don't know if OKC is ISO-9000 certified, I don't know if Ontario knife making is an industrial or hand made business, and I understand that the routing process sheet is not available to anyone (know-how protection), but actually I do notice a big difference with others knife manufacturers from which I use to buy knives.
Regarding 5160/1095 deviation issue, it is not unsual in business to face such concession for marketing, costing or manufacturing reasons, but at least, it is publicly displayed (Böker for example). Futhermore, I ignore of course the details of the agreement between J. Gincrich and OKC.
OKC has no specific forum, but I still expect that il will improve in the near future ...