- Joined
- Sep 5, 2005
- Messages
- 2,826
Well, if Batman can't handle him, he should drop the Clint Eastwood clinched teeth routine and go into being a stock broker. Seriously, his refusal to kill the Joker is reflective of today's demented society in which we tolerate recidivism in the name of taking the high road, even when the one committing the repeat offenses is brutal, relentless and pathological. Just think, had Batman (or someone) killed the Joker when they first had him, look at the numbers of people they would have saved, not to mention the hospital. Batman, after all, may have a code, but he's a vigilante.It showed Batman for what he is, a human being trying to do superhuman deeds, but is now faced with a villain as determined as he is. The movies transcended the same old "superhero saved the day" genre. You always expected that. In this movie you're really are not sure if Batman can stop the joker, and that change in expectations was great.
You said yourself that Batman walks the fine line between hero and villain, but in the end it was the DA who refused to kill the Joker, but he still lost his soul. The movies where the protagonist is forced into crossing the line are the most intriguing to me. Dirty Harry and Charles Bronson's characters often did this. If vigilantism is that which is resorted to when law fails, how much of a step is it to go from vigilante to executioner? Marvel's Punisher is one who is not deterred by the responsibility of taking life to save it.
Superheros are, by definition, people who use their abilities to save people. Back in the 60s, they never really killed anyone. That wasn't always the case. The original Superman comic strip featured a hero who quite frequently stood by while a bad guy fell to his death, then assumed a ho-hum attitude. This changed as it became more popular, and all superheros followed suit. Even the Lone Ranger knew how to shoot a gun out of someone's hand without breaking the skin.
Now superheros do take life to save others. Note Iron Man, who tallied up an enviable body count of terrorists in his recent movie. Getting back to Batman, though, as he deals with whether to cross the line, the end result is frustration and a high body count of innocent people.
Had the Joker forced Batman to cross that line, it would have been a more interesting study given today's extreme society. After 911, a friend of mine jubilantly proclaimed, "Political correctness is now dead!"to which I replied, "Dream on!" It all comes back to how far we, as a society, will go to save people from relentlessly evil people. Will we waterboard someone to keep a nuclear weapon from going off or to keep someone from releasing a deadly form of resistant Smallpox? Only time will tell. If The Dark Knight is any indication, we're in for a dark future.
At least, in the interim, the Joker could buy a decent knife.