Rameshacklee O B:
Thanks for all the replies. A friend of mine who doesnt care much for knives was asking me what I was reading and when I explained to him he started asking why anyone should have to carry weapons. Kind of a over board pacifist type. I was explaining to him that to me there are some knives that are tools and others that are clearly weapons. Everything I have read here so far seems to me like a very wisely chosen tool for any number of possible tasks that may come up in the time spent in the woods. Something like an Al Mar Warrior though feels to me like clearly a weapon, something that I would never expect anyone to take into the woods as a tool. And yet, people who dont really encounter knives on a regular basis seem to miss that point. I just thought I might add that.
Sometimes it's necessary (or at least, reasonable) to carry a knife into the woods that shares many features with a weapon. Common sense should prevail, of course, and - as always - use and intent mean just as much as design and form. I think you'll find that the line between what makes a good combat utility blade and what makes a weapon is often blurry, particularly because the primary use of most 'combat knives' is utility as opposed to weaponry. Take the Becker BK-9 (or BK-7) for example: it is billed as a 'combat bowie,' and is certainly large and strong enough to fill a combat role (actually, it's probably too large for most combat roles ...). BUT, these very features make it a reliable deep woods blade, and I have used mine as such for a few years now. The only combat it has seen is some aggressive baton use. The mini pouch on the sheath could hold a spare pistol magazine, but in my case, it holds a nice little 'Cody Lundin-style' mini survival kit. To me, it is a reliable tool. If I were swinging or brandishing it at fellow backpackers, it could justifiably be considered a weapon - but so could a SAK.
Of course, there are plenty of blades out there that are primarily designed to be used as weapons, and have specialized features for this purpose. You could conceivably go out into the woods with a punch dagger, stiletto, 'last ditch' backup knife (like the KaBar law enforcement models) or other such instrument, but if you put it to any serious use, I think it would become abundantly apparent why these sorts of objects are not ideally suited for common outdoors tasks. I believe that a reasonable person would realize this and self-correct their carrying habits.
Ultimately, my point is that in a world where knife carrying has become increasingly embattled, we enthusiasts seem to have a duty to educate neophytes about the uses and misuses of knives. Rather than simply proposing that such and such a blade is a weapon and ought not to be carried into the woods for that reason, I would suggest informing your colleague as to what features a good outdoors blade has, and why a dedicated weapon (as identified by its form and design) might be an inappropriate choice for camping / hiking.
To get to the meat of your initial question, I have settled (for now!) on carrying a Darrel Ralph Delta 5 drop point with partial serrations with me on most wilderness outings these days. I had a terrific time making the kit, and the knife has a very personal touch for me. The blade is unbelievably sharp (great for most cutting and eating tasks) but with a thick enough spine that it could baton in a pinch. The serrations (an experiment that I probably wouldn't repeat if I were to assemble another) are actually quite useful for cutting fishing line in a confined area. I carry it in a CRKT M60 drop sheath because I often spend time sitting in a canoe or boat and I find that some traditional belt sheaths can poke one in the side in these situations.
Here's a recent picture of my Delta 5 on a fishing trip in Muskoka.
All the best,
- Mike